 
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Squat list |
|
pixelgeek
|
Post subject: Squat list  Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:43 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:10 pm
Posts: 2642
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
|
|
Is there a formalized Squat list that is being used for E:A? Is the Demiurge list the most current?
_________________
Guns don't break formations. Blast Markers break formations.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
epilgrim
|
Post subject: Squat list Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:48 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 12:28 pm
Posts: 362
|
|
Both are still active.
Jaldon and I have been entertaining suggestions from the community with the intent to have one rule for Stubborn, and possibly trim some of the differences between our lists.
Going forward, both lists will continue, as they have different histories and are structured quite differently.
After a solid year with no changes to the Demiurg, I have begun a version 2.3 that will correct a few typos and address the use of the Cyclops as well as the Crucible Cannon. A version 3.0 will follow that will, at a minimum, streamline the TBM formation rules, which are admittedly a little too clunky. Ideally, Stubborn and some unit tweaking/toning will also be possible.
My personal hope is that Jaldon and I will be able to offer two divergent lists built around a common pool of units.
_________________
Squat/Demiurg Army Co-Champion (in cahoots with Jaldon)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
pixelgeek
|
Post subject: Squat list Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:15 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:10 pm
Posts: 2642
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
|
|
Was just looking through the Thurgrim's Stronghold list (which I assume is supposed to be the generic Squat list). Is Jaldon going to be updating the list? There are a few typos (Mounted in unit Notes where it doesn't belong) and there is oddly no way to transport Robots.
_________________
Guns don't break formations. Blast Markers break formations.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
nealhunt
|
Post subject: Squat list Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:10 pm |
|
| Purestrain |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
|
|
The question of formalizing Demiurg/Squat as part of the NetEA project has been proposed to the NetERC but there's no consensus at the moment.
_________________
Neal
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
