As promised....
Excuse the low quality of the pictures, I only managed a couple before my crappy camera ran out of juice.
Brethren:
Zealots;
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=11593 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 |
I don't think a Pulpitek is a LV... it's bigger than a Rhino. |
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 |
What about having a rule that states certain units may only be taken if you have an inquisitor present. Yup, I like the idea, and it neatly echos the necromunda list, which is structured as two lists in one, which the choice of a priest determining which rules are used. I would also drop the optoin of getting a redemptionist supreme commander, being abe to gather a large mob is one thing, organising it is quite another. Hmm, I'd rather retain the option of a high priest, though perhaps without supreme commander, and have the list go in two different directions based on the general selected. An inquisitor would allow access to inquisitorial selections and have supreme commander, whereas the high priest could give a special rule to the army, in a similar manner to farseers. What this special rule might be I'm not sure. This again neatly echos the necromunda list. If you don't have a priest leading the gang in necromunda the gang is considered a "mob", and may not take high tech equipment but gains leadership bonuses based on strength in numbers. If a priest is taken the gang has access to deacons who can carry special weapons, but loses the mob leadership benefits. This would neatly allow the two ideas for the list to be in one. Either it's a mob of mobs lead by the priesthood, or a sacrificial pawn of the inquisitors. |
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 6:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 |
As promised.... Excuse the low quality of the pictures, I only managed a couple before my crappy camera ran out of juice. Brethren: Zealots;
|
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 |
Right, I started a blog for the army: http://www.tacticalwargames.net/cgi-bin....t=11765 |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 |
I demand you start a blog on Warseer and confuse people with your tiny miniatures. |
|
| Author: | nealhunt [ Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 |
(Evil and Chaos @ Feb. 21 2008,23:45) QUOTE I don't think a Pulpitek is a LV... it's bigger than a Rhino. Well, now that I've seen pics, I have to agree. 
|
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 |
I've made an attempt at rewriting the list to try to fit some inquisitorial aspects in, with the choice of high priest/inquistor determining the makeup of the army, but I'm not at all happy with the results. It feels too much like two seperate lists, and is too restricting. I think I'll stick with the basic list as it is now, and revise from there, rather than shoehorning in inquisitorial aspects. |
|
| Author: | Pulsar [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 |
were is it posted? |
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 |
It's not, since I wasn't at all happy with it. |
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Redemptionist Crusade v1.0 |
Updated to V1.1 http://elf.planetquake.gamespy.com/Epic ... onists.htm |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|