No insight as to why he put a chaplain into what is possibly the least assaulty formation in the army?
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| White Scars (NetEA) V’s Biel-Tan Craftworld (4.2) http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=28601 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Tiny-Tim [ Fri Nov 28, 2014 10:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: White Scars (NetEA) V’s Biel-Tan Craftworld (4.2) |
Thanks for the report. No Aspects & SC? |
|
| Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Fri Nov 28, 2014 11:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: White Scars (NetEA) V’s Biel-Tan Craftworld (4.2) |
Ok, with that amount of flak it wouldn't be any fun, but the white scars still should of had a thunderhawk for all roundedness (is that a word?). COuld have delivered the bikes too. 4 Annihilator, Chaplain, Hunter Now that is an odd choice! Could have dropped the chaplain to make the warhounds seperate, or chaplain and a warhound to get a thunderhawk and Scout unit if you stripped the razorbacks back to one on the scouts, sticking one with the tacs... |
|
| Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: White Scars (NetEA) V’s Biel-Tan Craftworld (4.2) |
No insight as to why he put a chaplain into what is possibly the least assaulty formation in the army?
|
|
| Author: | Blip [ Fri Nov 28, 2014 2:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: White Scars (NetEA) V’s Biel-Tan Craftworld (4.2) |
Could be a (small) defence against getting assaulted...? |
|
| Author: | mordoten [ Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: White Scars (NetEA) V’s Biel-Tan Craftworld (4.2) |
Thinking outside of the box? Always good to try! |
|
| Author: | Oathed [ Tue Dec 02, 2014 10:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: White Scars (NetEA) V’s Biel-Tan Craftworld (4.2) |
Nicely put together. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|