Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Iyanden vs AMTL 3000p http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=28410 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | uvenlord [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 8:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Iyanden vs AMTL 3000p |
Hi, did a battle to test an alternitive list for the Iyanden with only the Wraithseer giving +1 in initiative and a stricter Living Few rule rule. AMTL Reaver 1. Carapace AA, Quake x 2, Landing plattform, Supreme Commander 875p Reaver 2. Plasma Destructor, Gatlin Blaster x 2 700p Reaver 3. Plasma Destructor, Gatlin Blaster x 2 700p Warhound AT. Vulcan, Plasma 275p Warhound. Turbolaser, Vulcan 300p Thunderbolt 150p IYANDEN Spirit Warhost 350p Spirit Warhost 350p Spirit Warhost in Wavesepents and a Wraith Seer 750p Swords of Vaul. Falcons x 3, Fire Storm x 2, Fire Prism x 1 300p Swords of Vaul. Falcons x 3, Fire Storm x 2, Fire Prism x 1 300p Guardians 150p Rangers 100p Vampire 200p Vampire 200p Nightwings 300p TURN 1 Attachment: Eldar wins initiative. Falcons double on Reaver 3, putting a blastmarker and lowering some shields. Retain: Vampire ground assaults the Reaver 3 (Reaver 1 AA fire, 1 DC on the Vampire as it aproaches)Fire fight = 2 wounds on the Reaver (1 crit) and 2 wraithguards killed Reaver wins with 1 and the Wraithguards regroup in the forest. The Vampire is destroyed. Reaver 1 sustain on Wraithguards with Waveserpents (refered to as WS), killing 1 WG and 1 WS Retain: Thunderbolts tries to go on CAP but fails. (usese SC without success) Guardians goes on Overwatch to delay activations. Reaver 3 fails to activate and regroup. 4 shields is powered up and 1 BM is lost. WS doubles towards an objective Warhound AT double and shoots at WS killing one Waveserpent Falcons double toward Reaver 2 and lowering 2 shields Retain: Nightwings fails to activate Reaver 2 double towards Falcons killing all but the one who hides behind a building Vampire uses SC and engage Reaver 2. Firefight = 4 DC lost on the Reaver, 1 Wraithguard killed. The Reaver runs toward the opponents Blitz. Warhound moves and fires at the Wraithguards in the woods killing the Spiritseer Rangers run toward the opponents Blitz ending up within 10 cm of Reaver 1 End of turn 1. Lone Falcon fale to rally and the Reaver repairs the crit, everyone else rally. TURN 2 Attachment: Eldar wins initiative and the Avatar appears behid the forest, looking at the damaged Reaver Wraithguards rolles snakeeyes (uses SC) and moves toward the Reaver. Reaver engage the guardians whishing to avoid the Avatar and WG support. Guardians fire OW and places a BM. The Guardians kills the Reaver only loosing 2 stands. (The Reaver fails to save any of the three hits...) A BM is placed on Warhound AT and Reaver 3 The Avatar moves up to the Warhound AT and drops a shield with the spear. Retain: The Vampire wants to break the Warhound AT but fails to activate Warhound AT uses SC. Marshal and fires at the WS Wraithguards fails to activate and shed some blastmarkers Warhound sustains on rangers killing 2 and breaking them. Retains with Reaver 1 who fires at the falcons killing 2 Firestorms and breaking the formation. WS hold and regroup Reaver double on WS killing 3 Wraithguards and 1 Waveserpent breaking the formation who "flees" to a nearby building. Thunderbolts attack Falcons killing 2 Falcons and a Firestorm Nightwings fail to activate once again... End of turn 2. Lone Falcon, WS and Rangers fail to rally. TURN 3 Attachment: Once again the Eldar win Wraithguards engage Warhound AT and destroys it. 1 Wraithguard is killed and the nearby Warhound gets a BM. Wraithguards move on to the opponents side and secures two objectives. Reaver 3 moves toward objective shoots at Wraithguards but only kills one. Nightwings attack Reaver 3 and shoots down some shields Retain: Vampire attacks Warhound but misses all shots Thunderbolt breaks the lone Falcon Guardians regroup Warhound double toward the middle, kills another of the Wraithguards breaking the formation. Wraithguard runs towards objective Reaver 1 sustain on WS killing 1... End of turn 3. Rangers fail to rally TURN 4 Attachment: AMTL wins Reaver 2 move and shoot at the WS killing 3 Wraithguards and 1 Waveserpent. The sole survivor of the BTS moves into house. Reaver 1 sustains on the Guardians killing 2 and greaking the formation Vampire uses SC and attacks Warhound scoring 3 hits and 1 DC breaking it Lone Falcon double on the Warhound doing 1 DC! Retain: Nightwings fails to activate again... Thunderbolt kills Falcon Wraithguards regroupes End of game. Rangers BTS and Guardians fail to rally. Victory points :Eldar 0 AMTL 0. Points: Eldar 1000 ATML 1950 AMTL wins! CONCLUSION: Well this is just one battle and a lot of the failed activations were 1:s but still... The Wraithguards is really tough, I do not think they are unbeatible gut they are really hard to get rid of. I think the restriction in numbers really makes the rolling assaults harder to do as there isn't enough units around. Also a failed activation on a mostly engaging force is really crippeling. The ATML is also really hard to beat but they also have a hard time winning. I'm guessing this will not be my last game loosing on points in turn 4 against AMTL |
Author: | Tiny-Tim [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 11:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Iyanden vs AMTL 3000p |
Thanks for the report. If I'd been playing the Eldar I might have risked air assaulting the two Warhounds as my first two activations but a good read. |
Author: | Vaaish [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Iyanden vs AMTL 3000p |
Thanks for the report! |
Author: | uvenlord [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Iyanden vs AMTL 3000p |
Tiny-Tim wrote: Thanks for the report. If I'd been playing the Eldar I might have risked air assaulting the two Warhounds as my first two activations but a good read. yes, that was the intent but they were hiding behind the bigger titans so it would have been a mess. There were only a small patch of non "zone of control" between the Reavers and the table edge and 2 Reavers would have been able to support. Guessing the Titans learn from their previous mistakes ![]() |
Author: | primarch [ Wed Oct 29, 2014 4:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Iyanden vs AMTL 3000p |
Hi! Cool! Thanks for sharing it! Primarch |
Author: | jimmyzimms [ Wed Oct 29, 2014 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Iyanden vs AMTL 3000p |
Quote: stricter Living Few rule rule Can you elaborate on the tweak? |
Author: | mordoten [ Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Iyanden vs AMTL 3000p |
2 supports for each wraithguard host? |
Author: | uvenlord [ Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Iyanden vs AMTL 3000p |
jimmyzimms wrote: Quote: stricter Living Few rule rule Can you elaborate on the tweak? Mordoten: The "2 supports..." still let me take a cheap guardian unit to get more support... My English suck (right now) so good luck trying to figure out what I mean ![]() |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |