Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

Necron Sautekh Expansion (0.3) V’s Iron Warriors(3) . take 2
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=28367		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Calico_Bill [ Wed Oct 22, 2014 6:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Necron Sautekh Expansion (0.3) V’s Iron Warriors(3) . ta
That was a most tactically challenging and fun battle Greg. Chaos owes it's victory to the supervision of "the Chaos cat". Valentino isn't nicknamed The Dark Lord for nothing. Excellent photo of him, and I'm still amazed at the photo detail throughout the AAR.
I found the Necrons Army a very tough opponent. While their bombers are bad news, they weren't overpowering as before.
My main problem when facing Necrons is a lack of targets turn 1 and their ability to pop up behind you after that.They make for a VERY different battle than against Orks or IG.
Thanks for an excellent game. See you Friday. ;D
Author:  Borka [ Wed Oct 22, 2014 11:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Necron Sautekh Expansion (0.3) V’s Iron Warriors(3) . ta
Thanks for your report! :)

Quote:
Necron Sautekh Expansion tries to retain the turn and doesn't, so IMMORTAL PHALANX doesn't come on(Photo1)


They would have been forced to use move for their hold action if using a an eternity gate.
Author:  Tiny-Tim [ Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Necron Sautekh Expansion (0.3) V’s Iron Warriors(3) . ta
Thanks for the report, it looks like an interesting game.

I like as a minimum the dropping to 2 BP for the Death Shroud. I would also like it to lose MW - as a person without the Necron source information is there a specific reason for them having MW do we know?
Author:  Borka [ Wed Oct 22, 2014 8:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Necron Sautekh Expansion (0.3) V’s Iron Warriors(3) . ta
Tiny-Tim wrote:
Thanks for the report, it looks like an interesting game.

I like as a minimum the dropping to 2 BP for the Death Shroud. I would also like it to lose MW - as a person without the Necron source information is there a specific reason for them having MW do we know?

Yes fluff and 40k rules would indicate MW (at the least) and also disrupt (they have "blind" and "pinning" in 40k).
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/