Vow that report (and game ofc) must have taken for ages to do!
Inspiring!
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| 60,000 POINT GAME http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=27609 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Tiny-Tim [ Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 60,000 POINT GAME |
Wow, what a game. Looks like a lot of fun & am glad I wasn't making the notes, taking the photos and trying to write it up. |
|
| Author: | Reedar [ Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 60,000 POINT GAME |
Cheers PFE, enjoyed going through that. Impressively clear batrep - even more so that it was on a game of that size!!! |
|
| Author: | Vaaish [ Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 60,000 POINT GAME |
That was just nuts. Thanks for sharing! |
|
| Author: | Vaaish [ Tue Jun 10, 2014 5:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 60,000 POINT GAME |
lol, yes that it definitely was. I think that's likely the largest amount of AMTL I've seen in one spot for quite some time. I lost track in there as to what all AMTL lost to add up to the 11k points though. Seemed like lots of shooting an stripping shields all over the board. AMTL was playing with a bit of a handicap though, I don't see that any of the titans met the requirements for the weapons surcharge. Any thoughts on how the list played at this scale? |
|
| Author: | caregadras [ Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 60,000 POINT GAME |
Great inspiring work! You give us emotions! Thanks PFE100! |
|
| Author: | Borka [ Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 60,000 POINT GAME |
Vow that report (and game ofc) must have taken for ages to do! Inspiring!
|
|
| Author: | Markconz [ Thu Jun 12, 2014 11:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 60,000 POINT GAME |
Wow big! Will check out at tomorrow in more detail, thanks! |
|
| Author: | Ginger [ Fri Jun 13, 2014 9:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 60,000 POINT GAME |
Most interesting. Especially liked the revised Objective marker rulings. Given the scale, and especially the lists, how 'balanced' did this feel, was there anything that stood out? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|