Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

[Analysis] Battle Results Thread
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=14090		 Page 1 of 12
Author:  zombocom [ Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:37 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
The purpose of this thread is to record the results of games in order to calculate win/loss statistics to assist in army development.

Please record the results in the following style:

Code Sample: 

Points Played: ZZZZ
Army A (Version X) vs Army B (Version Y)
Result: Army A wins
Score: N-M


In order to ensure fairness, please only record battles played according to the EA GT scenario.
Please only record the results of each game once, so double check to ensure your opponent hasn't already posted the results.

Feel free to add extra details such as army compositions if you wish.

Once we have 25 games reported for a specific army the margin of error drops below 10%, at which point I'll start posting current percentages and margins of error.
Author:  zombocom [ Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:38 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
Points Played: 3000
Dark Eldar (Raiders) vs Minervans (Raiders)
Result: Dark Eldar win
Score: 3-1
Author:  Hojyn [ Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:05 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
OK, I'll go first then.  :)

Necrons (Raiders) vs. Space Marines (Handbook 2008)
Result: Necrons win 4-0.

EDIT: link to batrep.
Author:  Chroma [ Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:06 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
EDIT - Moved to the discussion thread.
Author:  Chroma [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 5:02 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
Points Played: 3000
Biel-Tan (NetERC Recommendations) vs Necrons (Raiders) "Murder of Monoliths"-type list
Result: Biel-Tan win
Score: 3-1
Author:  The_Real_Chris [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 5:06 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
2000
Salamanders vs dark eldar
2-0 sallies
Author:  Dave [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:42 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
Here's what I was able to find by looking at some old posts on a local forum. The 4k games were with some new players, not sure if they should be included in anything you're compiling zombo.

9/14/2008
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/forums/ ... 84;t=13553
3000
Tyranid 9.1 vs Black Legion (LI edits)
BL surrendered to Tyranids

9/14/2008
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/forums/ ... 84;t=13553
3000
Tyranid 9.1 vs AM 1.07
0-0 (AM by points)

10/2/2008
3000
Tyranid 9.1 vs Guard 2008
2-0

10/11/2008
4000
Tyranid 9.1 vs AM 1.07
2-0

10/15/2008
3000
Tyranid 9.1 vs Guard 2008
0-2

10/26/2008
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/forums/ ... 84;t=13889
3000
Tyranid 9.1 vs AM 1.07
2-0

10/29/2008
3000
Tyranid 9.1 vs Guard 2008
0-2

11/1/2008
3000
Tyranid 9.1 vs Guard 2008
1-2

11/15/2008
4000
Tyranid 9.1 vs AM 1.07
2-0

11/15/2008
4000
Tyranid 9.1 vs Marine 2008
2-0

11/19/2008
3000
Tyranid 9.1 vs Guard 2008
1-2

11/22/2008
3000
Tyranid 9.1 vs Marine 2008
0-2 (I was an idiot and didn't deny They Shall Not Pass)

12/1/2008
3000
Marine 2008 vs Guard 2008
1-2

Edit: I forgot about a rule goof for 10/26. I actually won 2-0, not by points. DS and I had the BM for supporting in assault rule applied wrong.
Author:  Moscovian [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:46 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
Dave brings up a good point here (although he doesn't know it yet).  You should set a time limit on how retroactively you want the battlestats to go.  Otherwise you could end up with people cherry picking their past wins, inadvertently or not.  Of course you could get that anyway by not making a time limit but it certainly keeps the numbers from potentially skewing early on.
Author:  Dwarf Supreme [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:01 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
Thanks, Dave. You saved me some work, although it's kind of depressing to see how often I lose.
Author:  Chroma [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:02 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
I'd recommend only allowing games that use the lists "current", or better, at the start date of this collation.

So, Tyranid v8 or lower wouldn't count, etc.
Author:  Dave [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:15 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
Thanks Mosc. :p

I did purposely only include the most up to date reports thinking that those were the only ones Zombo wanted. I out smarted myself again.

I agree with Chroma though, keep it the latest stuff.

And DS, only two of those games are against you, 9/14 and 10/26. We're even with the latest lists. :cool:
Author:  zombocom [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:32 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
I'd say only current lists versions, and only go back in time one or two games per person, lest we start cherry picking wins. Battle reports can go back further.

Try not to include games against newbie/intro games etc.
Author:  vytzka [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:34 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
What if both players are newbies?
Author:  zombocom [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:39 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
Then that's ok I guess :)
Author:  vytzka [ Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:59 pm ]
Post subject:  [Analysis] Battle Results Thread
2000 points

Blood Angels (2.02) vs Biel-Tan Eldar (Swordwind + NetEA tournament mods)

Blood Angels win 2:0 (BTS, Blitz)

Flesh Tearers (Blood Angels) - t-hawk, t-hawk, devs sans rhinos + 2 hellfire dreads, DC x3, bikes, bikes +2 FA bikes, tacs + HS pred. destructors + hunter (BTS).

Misc. Eldar (Biel-Tan) - avatar, guardians + serpents (BTS), guardians + serpents (BTS), fireprisms, falcons w/ 2 firestorms, nightwings, aspect warriors (4 banshees/4 dragons), rangers x6 (I think).
Page 1 of 12 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/