Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?

 Post subject: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:37 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:58 am
Posts: 98
The 2014 Army Compendium includes, for example, the 3.0.3 version of Orkstein's Gargant Bigmob list, with Evil&Chaos listed as the Army Champion.

This thread has version 3.0.5 of the same list, and there's also a 3.0.4 version in another thread, both of which are now several years old. I wondered if there was a reason why the newer list hadn't made it into the Compendium in the last three years? Similar situations apply to several other Ork lists (Stompy Onslaught, Grotling Waaaagh!, Blood Axes).

The same thread has E&C stepping down as AC for the lists - is there a new AC for them, or does it default to Tiny-Tim?

Thanks!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:53 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
They default to me when an Ork Sub-AC steps down. Several of these lists were set up for fun with no serious desire to push them further.

At the moment there is no great desire to push these lists and I am concentrating on the other lists. However, if interest comes back to the list I'll appoint a new Sub-AC to manage and lead the development.

_________________
_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk - home of the UK Epic tournament scene
NetEA NetERC Xenos Lists Chair
NetEA Ork + Feral Ork + Speed Freak Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:08 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:58 am
Posts: 98
Cool, thanks for the quick response. My two Mega-Gargants and I certainly have some interest in seeing a Gargant list get some love.

I'll post up some feedback when I get a chance, and hopefully get some discussion going on these lists as well as the Approved ones.

Cheers!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:58 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:35 am
Posts: 3338
Location: Norrköping, Sweden.
I will gladly be the sub-AC for the gargant list and push it forward! :-)

_________________
https://epic40ksweden.wordpress.com/

"You have a right to be offended" - Steve Hughes
"Your feelings are hurting my thoughts" - Aron Flam


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:36 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:24 pm
Posts: 9655
Location: Manalapan, FL
^this would be AWESOME^

_________________
He's a lawyer and a super-villian. That's like having a shark with a bazooka!

-I HAVE NO POINT
-Penal Legion-Fan list
-Help me make Whitescars not suck!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 11:13 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 10:36 am
Posts: 95
Mate, I'd love to see some progress made on the Orks list.
I've been playing them for 4-5years now with no change.

- Kendall


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:01 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:35 am
Posts: 3338
Location: Norrköping, Sweden.
Yes, some well needed points drops in the approved lists for instance (battle/gunfortresses, stompas and battlewagons)

_________________
https://epic40ksweden.wordpress.com/

"You have a right to be offended" - Steve Hughes
"Your feelings are hurting my thoughts" - Aron Flam


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:47 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
JumpingJehovah wrote:
Mate, I'd love to see some progress made on the Orks list.
I've been playing them for 4-5years now with no change.

- Kendall

Beautiful isn't it.

_________________
_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk - home of the UK Epic tournament scene
NetEA NetERC Xenos Lists Chair
NetEA Ork + Feral Ork + Speed Freak Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:12 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
mordoten wrote:
Yes, some well needed points drops in the approved lists for instance (battle/gunfortresses, stompas and battlewagons)

If I propose any changes in the short term these will be to marry the main lists up with the E-UK lists.

Additional Oddboy option
Kommandos formation
Restriction on SF Fliers

_________________
_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk - home of the UK Epic tournament scene
NetEA NetERC Xenos Lists Chair
NetEA Ork + Feral Ork + Speed Freak Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:54 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 9:53 pm
Posts: 374
Tiny-Tim wrote:
mordoten wrote:
Yes, some well needed points drops in the approved lists for instance (battle/gunfortresses, stompas and battlewagons)

If I propose any changes in the short term these will be to marry the main lists up with the E-UK lists.

Additional Oddboy option
Kommandos formation
Restriction on SF Fliers


Edited

However Blood Axe lists have Kommandos as a themed unique formation.
What do you meen by restriction on fliers?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:34 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:35 am
Posts: 3338
Location: Norrköping, Sweden.
Has there been any talks about point drops in the ork lists in the EpicUK Scene?

_________________
https://epic40ksweden.wordpress.com/

"You have a right to be offended" - Steve Hughes
"Your feelings are hurting my thoughts" - Aron Flam


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:44 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:03 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: Leicester UK
I don't know, but there hasn't been any talk about it amongst my playgroup (who are all EpicUK dudes)

I've played against orks a load and can't see any problems with those specific units you mentioned, gunforts are AMAZING when spammed in large numbers, battlewagons are tricky as I think 25 would be too cheap given that they can transport 3 units and have better shooting within 30cm than a gunwagon, stompas always seemed solid as they are, the standard stompamob + supa stompa is pretty much the default BTS formation round our way and usually performs pretty well

battleforts are probably the only seriously suboptimal choice, though as I mentioned earlier they come into their own if you use an oddboy with the power field upgrade, then you can leave stuff mounted in relative safety ;)

_________________
Just some guy

My hobby/painting threads

Army Forge List Co-ordinator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:10 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:49 pm
Posts: 462
Location: Berlin
*** Edited by AC ***

In our experience it is a challenge to play Orks.

Main reasons seem to be.
Reliance on CC. Units with a decent FF value are light vehicles and never live long.
The CC units usually do not get into CC at least not in numbers. Bad saves and no Inspiring Characters are just enough to loose the combat. It helps to keep the troops in a Fortress, but they cost twice as much as an Gorgon and have only have the save and die on a crit.
The fact that the initiative is three for marches makes it difficult to swamp your opponent. If you double only, he gets more time to shoot you down or move out of the way. On the other hand, if you move too far ahead he shoots you assaults you, does an clipping FF and breaks you. Gretchin can help, but don’t have to. For one they might not be where needed and for everyone you use to soak up wounds you loose the attack of an Boy or even a Nobz when outmaneuvered or careless.
There is really nothing that can create some covering fire, because you have to double to keep up with the advance, but also because of the risk to fail the initiative roll. So you hit on 6es and 7es. You cannot have enough dices to make that deadly.
Depending on the situation and opponent, you might be able to use ”sustained fire” and just in case take the BM. You still only hit on 4's and a save of 5 will not offer much protection against return fire.
The lack of good saves, "Mob Rule" and lower prices for bigger formations, tempt you to take bigger formations.
But than activation count goes down and you will be out maneuvered, outshot and assaulted where you do not want to be assaulted.
The Oddboyz could be good, but again you usually have to move them twice. Because of their longer range you find yourself often in the situation that one would be suppressed if you fail your initiative roll. So again it's shooting badly
or less.
A Stompa/Supa Stompa Mob is easily broken. If you have no Supa Stomp you might garrison them, so you might get them into action. If you have a Supa Stompa the can't garrison and don't do that much. At the beginning they will be ignored and than killed off when the rest of the army is routed.
If your opponent is cc oriented it gets better, but again, a ”real” cc army has units that beat any mob you might create. Also it is much easier to get in FF range than CC range and many armies are stronger in FF.
The FightaBomma cost only 150pts and you can make larger units, which is great - but you pay for it in lower number of activations. On the other hand the do not really justice to the term Bomma and when attacking a Squadron of Marauders, there usually are not many left to fire on the Bombers.
The Landa looks good on paper, but when you see what punch the passengers can have and what punch the passengers of a Thunderhawk can deliver.

So basically they can’t march, they are bad when shooting, they are not good in assaults, because numbers in CC are not as good as numbers in FF. They don’t have a decent save, no inspiring characters. They have mixed initiative and an average strategic value. The activation count as usually depends on your style, but is usually not on the high side.

So anything good ?
Style and imagery.
”Mob Rule” is ok and needed because of bad initiative, Nobz are good, Gretchins can be good. Some really fast units. Lot’s of Leaders.

”Power of Waaagh” is very stylish, love it for that. But an initiative of 3 for everything but … is really hard.

The kind of opponent makes a big difference.
When you look at the army and compare the formations/units to their likes of other armies, then overall, you might say there are within the usual range of cost.
But other armies have usually things out of ”range” (to their benefit) and do not consist of mediocre units only.
That’s probably the real point, the best Orks have are mediocre formations. There are no Annhilators, no Void Spinner (NetEA - the Epic-UK is pathetic), no Rough Riders, no Necron (all of them :) , no Juggernauts - just take your pick.
The army is tuned for large formations (”Mob Rule”, lower relative cos of large units) that run towards the enemy and assault (”Power of Waagh”, lack of quality Firepower). Bad thing is that Epic rewards high activation count and that the units can often not make use of their size.

At least the way I see it.

Please note that is a rather dark picture, but it’s purpose is to show where problems are.

Potential remedies.
Bad Moonz or Heavies. Up to half the Boyz can be replaced with Bad Moonz/Heavies as a Boy , but 30cm TwinBig Shoota AP5/AT6 FF5 CC5
Landa Skorcha does only take 1 slot (like the SM Attack Bike)
Have a Warboss upgrade for a single Nobz in large or huge formations. The Warboss is inspiring for 25 pts each.
Blitz Brigades get option to replace GunWagon with Lung Bursta (Tank Bustas) a Gun Waggon with 45cm AP6/AT4 no transport, but 1 Gretchin and 1 BigGun (towed) for 5 pts each


THose should help without changing the character of the list.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:25 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:35 am
Posts: 3338
Location: Norrköping, Sweden.
I like your ideas alot *** Edited by AC ***


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Current Ork Developmental/Experimental lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2015 9:20 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:03 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: Leicester UK
I definitely think the gargant bigmob list should be developed further, and mordoten is the man for the job :)


Last edited by kyussinchains on Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net