Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

Lesser Daemons internal balance
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=82&t=23959		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  LordotMilk [ Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:49 am ]
Post subject:  Lesser Daemons internal balance
Just wondering if people pick Slaanesh or Khorne retinues with the Black Legion?

When I play the legion with Daemons, have most often used a combination of Tzeentch (for ground sloggers) and Undivided (for any fast attack or riding formations).

I know that Plaguerbearers 3+ save is really nice.

But Lesser Khorne really require a drop to be effective. How are you using them?
Author:  Steve54 [ Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Lesser Daemons internal balance
With the slow speed of the CSM FF daemons are always going to be the best option for retinues, bloodletters are good with terminators where they can teleport into CC range, daemonettes are good with smaller formations where you can minimise the attacks back
Author:  LordotMilk [ Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Lesser Daemons internal balance
Thank you.

I was just wondering if you had found the flamers 2x 4+ FF attack a bit imba, or if it evened out.
Author:  Steve54 [ Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Lesser Daemons internal balance
Well comparing them with PB, the other FF daemon, PB are less good in attack but have better saves - also when making an assault in FF you can put the PB in front of the CSM to take hits+preserve your CSM whereas the flamers tend to go behind to protect them
Author:  novemberrain [ Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Lesser Daemons internal balance
I think Flamers are a little ahead of the other daemons for the reasons you mentioned, but I think all of them have thier place.

This was part of the reason Horrors are core in the Daemon World list rather than Flamers.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/