| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| BL Review:titans+DW http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=82&t=22699 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Steve54 [ Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | BL Review:titans+DW |
IMO the Ravager is a decent choice no it has been upgunned, especially as it works well with the rest of the list. How have people found the feral since it lost the MW on the barrage? Is is comparable to the Death Wheel? Banelord - this seems to be rarely taken, are there specific problems with it or is it just a slow 800pt WE? |
|
| Author: | Man of kent [ Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BL Review:titans+DW |
what are the changes to the ravager? can't find the right topic |
|
| Author: | Steve54 [ Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BL Review:titans+DW |
The Doomburner went to TK(D3) rather than TK. The idea is that its a small WE killer now. This in the armybook and also changed in EUK list |
|
| Author: | frogbear [ Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BL Review:titans+DW |
Steve54 wrote: Banelord - this seems to be rarely taken, are there specific problems with it or is it just a slow 800pt WE? Yes to the last point Now give Khorne back his Banelord and replace it with a standard chaosified warlord titan. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BL Review:titans+DW |
frogbear wrote: Steve54 wrote: Banelord - this seems to be rarely taken, are there specific problems with it or is it just a slow 800pt WE? Yes to the last point Now give Khorne back his Banelord and replace it with a standard chaosified warlord titan. I view all 3 black legion titans as khorne blessed. 800pts is too much for a list that struggles on activations. Even though the list is a strong one, incidentally, it just falls apart when you take away 2 more activations. This is common to imperial warlords too IMO unlike eldar or ork titans they're not as powerful and synergetic as their pOints level would imply. |
|
| Author: | madd0ct0r [ Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BL Review:titans+DW |
i'd assume they are more useful at higher point values. I'd echo frogbear that it feels a little odd that the bl titans are khornate. not desperately odd, just a little off. Not sufficient to warrant changing them though IMO. |
|
| Author: | Steve54 [ Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BL Review:titans+DW |
Evil and Chaos wrote: frogbear wrote: Steve54 wrote: Banelord - this seems to be rarely taken, are there specific problems with it or is it just a slow 800pt WE? Yes to the last point Now give Khorne back his Banelord and replace it with a standard chaosified warlord titan. I view all 3 black legion titans as khorne blessed. Thats my view too, that the Chaos Titan Legion allied to the BL in this list are Khornate |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|