Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

CSM list review

 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:04 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:16 pm
Posts: 81
Location: Belgium

(Hena @ Mar. 21 2008,10:07)
QUOTE
Sure you can argue that it's a "meat shield" but it certainly is not that in Lost and the Damned list. In there the demons are very good at assault compared to cultists.

Yes, but again it is so tempting (and so useful !) to use them as meatshields so that the big infantry formations can survive for a longer time. The "disposable like" rule is the main reason of this - and after all, daemons have a so good Armor (with Invulnerable Save, after all) that they can actually survive to the hit, saving a small cultist for later.

Those two factors make them so much better as meatshields, even for the Lost and the Damned. In my games with this list (I'm talking about the official one, not my fan list), I tend to use them more as meatshields rather than true assault troops...That's why I'm displeased with the current rules.

If they had a lesser Armor and no "disposable like" rule, then things would be very different...But then they would be so less useful and, I'm sure of it, not really that important to summon in mortal formations rather than gathered in their own formations.

Well I partly agree. However the main difference is the super heavies. Marines don't have those. Also the marine formations are more expensive and smaller due to ATSKNF which helps very much in balancing the variability. That is the reason why the 2 tiered is kind of needed.


I believe super heavies just should be in the heavy support section, along with chaos navy and titans. It solves a lot of troubles with "war engines heavy" lists. Of course, that makes them much less interesting (hey, you have to choose that way), but Black Legion still have many choices and they don't need to have war engines outside of that famous "third of army points".


About the titans...
And here I don't. There is stylistic reason to not make Chaos things to be "same as imperial but with Demons!".


Well, in that case, I would like to fully use the "God marked titans" idea ; give to the Black Legion not just Khorne marked titans, but Tzeentch, Nurgle and Slaanesh marked ones as well. After all, you can choose cult marines and daemons from all of the four gods. Why not the titans ?

Then you'll have a true "Black Legion feeling" choice. For now, just Khorne is a bit...frustrating.


Since I like the different Demons, I'm obviously against this kind of thing. Once more I'm inclined to think that 40k doesn't quite represent the size of the armies and thus the army restrictions isn't quite the same. Also I'm not sure that following all the moves of 40k is wise.


Fine for the faction rule, but then give me Slaanesh, Nurgle and Tzeentch marked titans for Black Legion, and not just Khorne. :p

But you know, everything is not bad in the way W40k is evolving. Sure, it's no more the same than before with only four Gods and their daemons, with nothing else truly represented outside of them...But then I like the possibility to play "Undivided Greater Daemons" to represent one of the many powerful being in the Warp. I always found stupid that this huge dimension has only the Four Gods as Supreme Powers and nothing else about the "smaller" Chaos being that represent Undivided Chaos, speaking about representation in the Chaos armies.

Generic Daemons are also a good way to simplify the rules of the list. It's not saying that marked daemons don't exist anymore ; just that the differences are not that important to the "eye" of the Epic system. Same for "generic Chaos titans". Truth is, it's more difficult to playtest a list with a myriad of different profiles, one for each God...'cause there are so many possible combos and that a "small" difference at first can be in fact quite important.






Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:12 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
But you know, everything is not bad in the way W40k is evolving


I agree, but you're going to have a damn hard time convincing Hena of that. :)

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:17 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 227
Can't you summon daemonic beasts to represent undivided daemons? I thought that was the point.

Add in undivided daemons if you wish, the beasts are already there and you can also use furies from the appendix, the stats were tested and they were removed due to lack of models I believe. But dont ask for the classic daemons to be removed...

And regarding playtesting of daemon stats - thats been extensively done. There is no worry about relative balance of the daemons, the issue is summoning (if there is even an issue past the wordiness of the rule).

Saying that the difference between the different daemon types is irrelevant is like saying we should just have one profile for aspect warriors :(

Fluff wise, undivided chaos is terribly vague and abstract if its developed the wrong way, and will spoil a lot of the flavour of chaos armies - as the reaction to the most recent chaos codex shows.

I feel undivided chaos is done well with respect to the wordbearers...I think removing the classic daemon types from the black legion is going too far.

Ultimately I would submit that the 40k development of the Black Legion in the codex does NOT represent the fluff properly, perhaps due to the scale of the armies as Hena says (the army compositions make no sense for any of the races) but also due to the cartoon nature of the game - and the heavy influence of gameplay and marketing considerations.

Everyone should remember that NO 40k fluff ever goes out of date. Its ALL valid. That comes from GW itself, and you can see it in how often old fluff resurfaces again in new fluff. The idea that old descriptions of chaos are invalidated by new descriptions of chaos is, quite frankly, wrong. Especially so when it comes to CHAOS!

Epic allows for a more focused view, and thus a more complete view. We should not be fettered by 40k, just informed by it. We have the freedom to reflect the fluff better, and we have the freedom to make a more balanced and playable game for the epic rules





_________________
They are free, yes, but not entirely free; for they have a master, and that master is Law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:45 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:16 pm
Posts: 81
Location: Belgium

(Kleomenes @ Mar. 21 2008,12:17)
QUOTE
Saying that the difference between the different daemon types is irrelevant is like saying we should just have one profile for aspect warriors :(

I will just react on this, if it doesn't bother you.

First, I agree with you. No, really, I understand that people don't like the "neo fluff" as it is sometimes called. I don't like some parts myself, but I'm not against everything of it.

What I'm just saying is not that the difference between marked daemons is irrelevant. I'm just saying that it is not that important for a "generic" list like Black Legion.

In fact, I find "God marked" profiles (daemons, titans or even daemon engines) would be better placed in "God marked" army list. I mean, World Eaters with Bloodletters, Bloodthirsters, Khorne Cannons, Brass Scorpions, Lord of Battle, Banelords, Ferals, Ravagers and so on. Cult marines can be kept, but the faction rules aren't that important for Black Legion...'cause they're the same army, even if they worship different gods they still obey to Abaddon and are loyal to the Black Legion.

That's why I would use "generic daemons" and/or "generic Chaos titans" for them...because these differences in these fields aren't that important for them. After all, it's not an army list about marked daemons or marked titans ; it's an army list about Black Legion.

But for a "God marked" army list, specific profiles are important to give that special flavour to it. What would be the World Eaters without the Bloodletters to summon ? Nothing but just a bunch of crazy madmen running toward the ennemy, for sure. :D

I agree the profiles were tested and talked about for a long time, but trouble is...too many choices can kill the choice. It's not a hazard if Plaquebearers are THE perfect meatshield or if some greater daemons are somewhat found...weaker than other (if played at all, that is).

Black Legion is the generic Chaos list. It must have a lot of flexibility, but it doesn't need to have all of marked daemons and/or titans to be the Black Legion. That's just it.






Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 3:38 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:36 pm
Posts: 653
Daemons:

Again. I believe LD summoning works nicely. pixelgeek cited some fluff 1,5 years ago stating the BL?s disdain for daemonic minions and strongly supporting the "disposable" postition.

It?s a different matter with regards to the LatD, though I?m not sold on the effectiveness of the Meat Shield there. Cultists are cheap and formations will have BM anyway, I rather preserve my LDs for actual engagements which the Covens can?t win on their own with their lowly CC and FF values. There is hardly any worse infantry in the game, folks.

And keep the variety! I do believe we managed to balance the daemons nicely, yes their effectiveness varies at different tasks but that?s what it?s all about, right?

40k going to generic daemons is more likely the result of streamlining production (e.g. cutting down the model range) than anything else, so why bother when we have working stats?


Titans:

While they bear khornate names, the descriptions make either no mention of the affiliation or have been amended to include all powers before the list was officialised, that was over a year ago.

Specifically the Banelord had this added:

"The other Ruinous Powers are also known to create twisted versions of the Banelord
as well. The Nurgle Plaguelord, Slaanesh Painlord and Tzeentch Warplord Titans are malevolent cousins
to the Banelord, all built for the same dark purpose."

Is it really an issue? Shouldn?t a full compliment of various and god-specific titan weaponry be left to a Chaos Titan Legion army list, to be done once AMTL has been sorted out? (Especially since that one is seeing good progress lately).

Oh, and ceterum censeo that the Ravager is undergunned... :p

0-X choices

Instead of doing a major overhaul, 1 per X-thousand points will do and scale better.


Decimator/Feral MW barrages:

With the errata published, where do we stand? Without the AT-to-AP column shift, they obviously lost some of their punch. They still kill Marines like flies, though.





_________________
Visit www.epic-battles.de the ultimate german epic site&forum!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 3:39 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
With the errata published, where do we stand? Without the AT-to-AP column shift, they obviously lost some of their punch.


They're over-strong even now.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 3:47 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:36 pm
Posts: 653
Moved: http://www.tacticalwargames.net/cgi-bin....2;st=45




_________________
Visit www.epic-battles.de the ultimate german epic site&forum!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:05 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:10 pm
Posts: 2642
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

(Irondeath @ Mar. 21 2008,06:47)
QUOTE
I dislike the MW as well.

Both the Decimator and Feral could lose it, in order to give BL less "Ignore cover" maybe keep it on the Hellmouth and lose MW there while retain MW on the Decimator and lose IC.

There have already been suggestions for those vehicles in the Decimator topic

_________________
Guns don't break formations. Blast Markers break formations.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:57 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
40k going to generic daemons is more likely the result of streamlining production (e.g. cutting down the model range) than anything else, so why bother when we have working stats?


Ehm..you realised that GW is actually producing a Daemon Codex? So no cutting down of ranges. All different Chaos Daemon models are still valid. They are even new models for it.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:59 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Indeed, there are many new Daemon types being produced for the new Codex.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:23 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:16 pm
Posts: 81
Location: Belgium

(Irondeath @ Mar. 21 2008,14:38)
QUOTE
Is it really an issue? Shouldn?t a full compliment of various and god-specific titan weaponry be left to a Chaos Titan Legion army list, to be done once AMTL has been sorted out? (Especially since that one is seeing good progress lately).

Ah, of course, if a Chaos Titan Legion army list can be made in the future, it would be interesting to allow the Black Legion to choose their "God marked titan". But that's another story not already written.  :D

For being an issue...Well, just for those who like sticking to the fluff like me, yes it is. Still, I agree it's just a small detail for rule purposes.

About generic daemons in 40k, it was more about simplifying the Chaos list rather than limiting the models. In fact, it's quite the opposite ; you can use any daemon model for those, since they're...generic !


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:28 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
Yes.Insteads of havingonly 1 Lesser Daemons type per God plus Daemonic Beats you now have 5 Generic Lesser Daemons which are universally available.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:36 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 1:39 pm
Posts: 227
The whole idea of 'generic' daemons goes against the idea of Chaos fluff! Chaos = Variety. Its clearly a choice not mandated by fluff in 40k - so its not a choice that need be followed in epic.

_________________
They are free, yes, but not entirely free; for they have a master, and that master is Law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: CSM list review
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:49 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
It goes with the fluff. Because as anUndivided Legion the BlackLegiondoesn't concentrate to worship one particular Chaos God uns thus summons ANY Daemon who wants to show up. So the Gerneic Daemons cpuld be actualla Undivided Daemons, Daemons of one or severa ldifferent  Lesser Chaos Gods,  Daemons of different Major Chaos Gods and/or a mix of the above.

In the end you have a mix of very different Daemons which as a whole have the same effectivity.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net