Steve54 wrote:
I've never seen the BL design concept as that - where is that from. In my opinion the BL list has had a lot of issues which were covered up by the crutches of MW ferals and multiple WEs. Now those have been removed the list is a bit weak. The daemon, havocs+ structure changes try and address that. I don't see why you would now have to play with daemons
I really think you're getting a bit too focused on the decimator change. Before you could easily fit 4 WEs in a list, now its 3.
I can't see it as a bad thing if an over reliance on WEs is removed. If the list is competitive with none that would be fantastic.
Comparing IG and BL lists isn't very useful.
I agree that the non-WE part of the list has some issues, and I sincerely applaud the directions of the tests for this (the Helltalon is still an issue though).
But the BL concept (as I understand it) comes from here:
nealhunt wrote:
QUOTEWhat was the thinking behind allowing Decimators in the Black Legion list in the first place?
I'm assuming it was Jervis who proposed their introduction?
Replace the generic "titans gone bad" with chaos-specific engines in keeping with the 40K design trend against every race having big walkers as war engines. Decis and Deathwheels were both JJ's ideas. And, of course, SM superheavies have the old school SM/TL era tradition behind them and the background has sort of picked up the "Marines backed up by low quality troops" theme as part of a pre-heresy legacy fitting for CSMs.