Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST

 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:04 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:03 pm
Posts: 1081
Location: London, UK
Daemon Prince 3+ RA save anybody?

_________________
Image
Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:08 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
It's always had that - it was when it had TK attacks as well that it was absurd.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:27 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 4311
@lordotmilk to suggest I'm making dictatorial decisions purely on my own views is ridiculous. Try looking at months of discussion before throwing out accusations.

@ginger the 10-15% overpowered is ridiculous and not born out by any facts

Re: the death wheel. I am under the impression it was a universally popular movce putting it in allies to prevent 3 ferals+3 DW

Everybody had months to put forward their views on units+issues. The change list is what was produced, if you don't like it you should have spoken up much earlier. At this point it is there to test, items that are shown to work in testing will be adopted those that don't will be readdressed. No testing and we stick with the 2012 version.

_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk
NetEA NetERC Human Lists Chair
NetEA Chaos + Black Legion Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:12 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:52 pm
Posts: 4262
One quick question regarding summoning.

If I elect to sacrifice my champion to get a greater daemon can I still roll 2D3 for lesser daemons or are all the summoning points used to get the GD in play?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:00 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:39 pm
Posts: 1974
Location: South Yorkshire
Unless it's already been decided I"d suggest when the Champion is sacrificed it counts as 6 summoning points and then the 2x d3 rolls are added to this to give the chance to gain lesser daemons along with the greater daemon.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:31 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 695
Location: Geneva, Swizerland
8 Fearless WEs at 3k points. In a very much approved list.

I dont think it's a very strong list, but I do believe it fits in the fluff and it it poses some challenges to play against.

Why is it ok, but not the BL with 6 Fearless WEs (again, as you mentioned, not the best BL list either)?

The design concept of the BL was CSM infantry with SHT support. With the removal of the two SHT from the main list, and the improvement of Daemons (a good thing by all standards), it is becoming a CSM Daemon heavy army with some light WE allies. Really not the same design concept. Please reconsider. It is more than a balance issue that you are touching. It's the whole feel of the list.

Fearless WEs, 2975 POINTS
Steel Legion (NetEA Army Compendium v20120208)
==================================================

REGIMENTAL HQ [550]
Supreme Commander, 12 Infantry, 7 Chimera, Hydra

INFANTRY COMPANY [300]
Commander, 12 Infantry, Hydra

WARHOUND TITAN [275]

WARHOUND TITAN [275]

INFANTRY COMPANY [300]
Commander, 12 Infantry, Hydra

SUPER-HEAVY TANK PLATOON [200]
Baneblade

SUPER-HEAVY TANK PLATOON [200]
Baneblade

SUPER-HEAVY TANK PLATOON [200]
Baneblade

SUPER-HEAVY TANK PLATOON [200]
Baneblade

SUPER-HEAVY TANK PLATOON [200]
Baneblade

WARHOUND TITAN [275]

_________________
"War is not about who is right, but about who is left". - B. Russell


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:59 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 4311
I've never seen the BL design concept as that - where is that from. In my opinion the BL list has had a lot of issues which were covered up by the crutches of MW ferals and multiple WEs. Now those have been removed the list is a bit weak. The daemon, havocs+ structure changes try and address that. I don't see why you would now have to play with daemons

I really think you're getting a bit too focused on the decimator change. Before you could easily fit 4 WEs in a list, now its 3.

I can't see it as a bad thing if an over reliance on WEs is removed. If the list is competitive with none that would be fantastic.

Comparing IG and BL lists isn't very useful.

_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk
NetEA NetERC Human Lists Chair
NetEA Chaos + Black Legion Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:26 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 695
Location: Geneva, Swizerland
Steve54 wrote:
I've never seen the BL design concept as that - where is that from. In my opinion the BL list has had a lot of issues which were covered up by the crutches of MW ferals and multiple WEs. Now those have been removed the list is a bit weak. The daemon, havocs+ structure changes try and address that. I don't see why you would now have to play with daemons

I really think you're getting a bit too focused on the decimator change. Before you could easily fit 4 WEs in a list, now its 3.

I can't see it as a bad thing if an over reliance on WEs is removed. If the list is competitive with none that would be fantastic.

Comparing IG and BL lists isn't very useful.



I agree that the non-WE part of the list has some issues, and I sincerely applaud the directions of the tests for this (the Helltalon is still an issue though).

But the BL concept (as I understand it) comes from here:

nealhunt wrote:
QUOTEWhat was the thinking behind allowing Decimators in the Black Legion list in the first place?

I'm assuming it was Jervis who proposed their introduction?

Replace the generic "titans gone bad" with chaos-specific engines in keeping with the 40K design trend against every race having big walkers as war engines. Decis and Deathwheels were both JJ's ideas. And, of course, SM superheavies have the old school SM/TL era tradition behind them and the background has sort of picked up the "Marines backed up by low quality troops" theme as part of a pre-heresy legacy fitting for CSMs.

_________________
"War is not about who is right, but about who is left". - B. Russell


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:36 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 4311
So nothing about CSM with WEs as a list concept. All that describes is what WEs the list would have as an option - originally not chaos titans but unique WEs

_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk
NetEA NetERC Human Lists Chair
NetEA Chaos + Black Legion Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:44 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 695
Location: Geneva, Swizerland
Its funny how these things are.

I read it as thee WEs being part of the core of the army, not the alllies section.

I hear what you are saying concerning BL must be viaable without WEs, but so many other lists have WEs on core (SM Landing Craft and Thunderhawks, Guard SHt, Eldar EoV, etc.), and some of them are also fearless.

If there are better lists than WE hvy lists then it should not be such a problem, and if the non-WE lists are not better, perhaps this is an issue of pricing up the core WEs, or Pricing down the alternatives?

_________________
"War is not about who is right, but about who is left". - B. Russell


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:52 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 4311
I really think you're making too big a deal of the changes. Before you had 2-3 slots to choose between terminators/chosen/decimators, now you have 3-4 to choose between titans, decimators and air/space

_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk
NetEA NetERC Human Lists Chair
NetEA Chaos + Black Legion Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:01 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Part of the issue with the Black Legion army list is that they didn't have anything like as tight a development process as most other lists. They ended up without a strong central theme and big imbalances and it's taken years of revisions to try and poke them into a better shape.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:33 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 695
Location: Geneva, Swizerland
Well I had played and understood the central theme as a WE heavy groundlsogging CSM force, with the ability for a powerful drop.

The Rhinos, Bikes and raptors were there either to snatch objectives or support the drop.

TBH that's how I have been selling the army to friends when they hesitate on what to collect or play.

Now you seem to say that this was not the focus, or at least that you wish to change it. I actually like that theme... ???

On the topic of the Helltalon, IC is Tzeentch's special thing on planes. Could we go 3 BP or Disrupt instead? It would allow for less concept redundancy in Chaos aircraft.

_________________
"War is not about who is right, but about who is left". - B. Russell


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: BLACK LEGION REVIEW - CHANGES TO TEST
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:12 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:03 pm
Posts: 1081
Location: London, UK
If your playgroup in CH is self-contained, then why not pick and choose the rules you want? Not being flippant at all, just take NetEA and EpicUK's best and fairest bits and use those. Of course keep participating in this discussion and you can even use your tweaked list's game feedback as a tool to get the changes you feel are right.

_________________
Image
Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net