jimmyzimms wrote:
Steve54 wrote:
jimmyzimms wrote:
That's a lamentable position IMHO
If you're that concerned why don't you take the list on.
My view was that as a scenario or large/casual game army the list was fine and accurately represented the IA source but unsuited as a tournament list. Barring stat changes I can see no reason to alter it.
Perhaps this is unsuitable for a tournament list but this feels very much like a decision made by fiat and without regard to the community wishes (whatever they may be). For an organization that prides itself on open design, not even laying out that the choice had been made (admittedly which is ultimately yours to make), let alone the reasoning behind why you chose (where choosing) to move this out of NetEA as being "unsuitable", simply makes me a sad panda. I'm not criticizing the choice that was made but am not happy with the way it apparently was done, that's all mate.
If I'm misreading the situation then great, enlighten me.
If no one else makes a decision to run with this, NetEA or as Fan-List I'll be happy to watch it to at least keep things in line with the general unit stats and trends and faction rules if they change ad incorporate feedback. In a perfect universe I'd really love to see GlynG take it on as he's really the most experienced with it and very much gets the Vraks fluff/feel.
What shadowy decision am I supposed to have made? The list is still in the compendium and tournament pack.
I haven't viewed it as a priority as
- no one is interested, This thread was dormant for 4 years
- it is fine as it is
- no changes to IA to affect it
- very few recent games
- not really suitable for tournament play
If somebody wants to run with it then great, but they haven't mentioned it in the last 4 years, if not then I'm not going to start for the reasons above.