Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 103 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

Iron Warriors list?

 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:38 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:29 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Kraków Poland
ok I rewrote everything into one document, I'll post it tomorrow. Decided to:
- add the Chaos Thunderhawk Gunship (as a support formation), as in BlackLegion's Red Corsair list
- add the Chaos Hunter (upgrade)
- increase the cost for the Basilisk support formation to 275 points (they cost 250 in the Steel Legion so I presumed 275 because of the higher In. Should it be even higher like 300?)

still thinking which obliterator's to put in the list, the official, or changed from the 'proposed changes thread'. What do you think? I added the hunter, so their AA isn't so needed anymore.

BTW, Vindicators are 20cm or 25cm? In the red corsairs are 25, but in the official are 20. Was there any sort of errata?

Sorry for the endless barrage of questions ;) I'll test the list against my brothers tyranids tomorrow hopefully  :)





Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:47 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
I would prefer Steves list (fixed to remove all the 0-x business, free SC and the other niggles) to that. Thunderhawks and stuff are loyalist and recent rebels, not traitor legions.

While watching toast with surround sound what would be your thought on a proper grand company? Okay 20 stands is out :) What about a guard 12 + Lord style? It could then infer the loyalists adopted their superior organisations for their own armies :)

Arty wise I like 3 artillery types in the list - the basilisk and then equivalents for manticores and bombards (both of which were used in the heresy but would have been impossible to maintain logistically).

I would also suggest different weapon configs for the Titans. Make them siege breakers?

So say inferno weapon on a warhound equivalent (well the feral practically is this), an assault rather than stand off warlord (tearing down terras walls) and perhaps a multirole reaver equivalent to the loyalist MRL/TLD/PF. With tails, chomping mouth etc etc :) Maybe for a rebel reaver inferno weaponry, rockets, CC tail and head, gatling style weapon.

_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!
'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:17 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:29 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Kraków Poland
I don't mind the 0-x idea. It should keep the possible army lists fluffy  :agree:

Hmmm I remember a story in one of the older White Dwarfs when Abaddon the Despoiler was on a Thunderhawk Gunship. Also, there were some Chaos Thunderhawk conversions done by GW, so I presume that Traitor Legions do possess them, at least the Black Legion and the Iron Warriors should as the most active and noticeable of the TL.

The weapons on the titans are something to think about, however I don't have enough experiance in this system :glare: and war engines to make something new and balanced, so it would be up to you guys, the same with the number of stands. I must rely on your superior knowledge and gaming experiance  :)

I like Steve's list and the whole project. We need more such lists for the rest of the TL.  :agree:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:23 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
The 0-x is there to balance the list at 3000 points. If you are changing it you need to alter things a bit.

_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!
'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:23 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Quote: (Laylo @ 26 Jul. 2009, 00:17 )

I don't mind the 0-x idea. It should keep the possible army lists fluffy  :agree:

0-x limits are fine if you only ever want to play 3000pt games. Anywhere too far from that vacinity and the 0-x limits start creaking badly.

Better to use some sort of sliding scaling, such as 0-1 per X points, or whatever.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:35 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:39 pm
Posts: 1974
Location: South Yorkshire
Quote: (Evil and Chaos @ 26 Jul. 2009, 00:23 )

0-x limits are fine if you only ever want to play 3000pt games. Anywhere too far from that vacinity and the 0-x limits start creaking badly.

Better to use some sort of sliding scaling, such as 0-1 per X points, or whatever.

There already is a kind of sliding scale for the 0-x limits.

Many moons ago Jervis told us with the list's being balanced for games between 2000 and 5000 points all formation limits were set at per 5000 points.If players wanted to play bigger games they should adjust the limits accordingly.

All 0-1 limits at up to 5000 points become 0-2 at 5001-10000 and 0-3 at10001-15000 etc.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:49 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
That is indeed true, but the difference between 0-1 at 2000pts and 5000pts is considerable.

A theoretical 500pt formation will be 25% of your army list at 2000pts, but only 10% of your army list at 5000pts.

The knock-on effect being that at 2000pts you can pack your army full of the restricted formations, whilst at 5000pts you'll have run out of restricted formations a while ago.

In an army list where 0-x limits have been introduced in order to paper over known balance problems (undeniable for the Black Legion army list), and where the list contains many 0-x limits (as the Black Legion army list does), it consequentially follows that a 2000pt army list can be composed pretty much 100% of these underpriced/overpowered formations, whilst a 5000pt army list might only be allowed to take ~30% of its points from these restricted (known overpowered) formations... there is a clear balance issue there.

Notably, whilst most army lists will only include one or two 0-x limited formations, the Black Legion has three of its seven Core formations with 0-x limits... when 40% of your formations are under 0-x restrictions, and those restrictions were put in place in order to paper over known balance problems when those formation types were 'spammed', you cannot expect the army list to remain at the same level of balance when you stray from the 3000pt level the list was playtested at.

So yeah, it's fine when your 0-x limits are a single Avatar, or a single formation of Deathstrikes (plus Spacecraft, but those are limited due to pure game mechanic needs rather than balance), but clearly wobbly when more than 40% of your Core army choices are under 0-x restrictions.




_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:07 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:39 pm
Posts: 1974
Location: South Yorkshire
Quote: (Evil and Chaos @ 26 Jul. 2009, 00:49 )

In an army list where 0-x limits have been introduced in order to paper over known balance problems (undeniable for the Black Legion army list), and where the list contains many 0-x limits (as the Black Legion army list does), it consequentially follows that a 2000pt army list can be composed pretty much 100% of these underpriced/overpowered formations, whilst a 5000pt army list might only be allowed to take ~30% of its points from these restricted (known overpowered) formations... there is a clear balance issue there.

I see a little more clearly where you and TRC are coming from now.

I think we can all agree that 0-x limits for rare/Elite formations etc.is OK but setting 0-x limits on formations just to keep the list "internally" balanced isn't always the way to go.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:37 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 4311
Edited the list-

IW Grand Company - added upgrade of 0-4 CSM.  To allow larger size Grand Company

Increased Basilisk cost

Removed 0-2 on Terminators, only remaining 0-x limit is Raptors

Other suggestions

BL - I don't see any need to replace Imperial SHTs with obscurely referenced variants, if anything maybe replace the Shadowsword with the more siege orientated Stormsword

Adding thunderhawks - If we go down that route than we go towards SM with extra stuff. Also the list would become artillery to suppress flak and then air assault in operation whereas the intention is that it will be artillery with a mechanised tide.

Hunter - if we go down the route of removing flak from the oblit - depending on whether this is finalised with BL, I would prefer to include hydras as AA. I'm not keen on the stalker either as a completely made up unit.

Siege dread cost - best to start to high and reduce if necessary




_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk
NetEA NetERC Human Lists Chair
NetEA Chaos + Black Legion Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 8:16 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 4311
Ravager, feral, raptors and oblits cost changed to reflect netEA tourney changes. I'll not adopted any of the BL changes because as far as I can see they are still under playtest at the moment and have not been finalised. I'd prefer to test the rest of the list before muddying the waters with the additional items.

If and when they are adopted I'll put those changes in - though I can't stand them.

I'll replace the shadowsword with the stormsword when I have the stats to hand.

_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk
NetEA NetERC Human Lists Chair
NetEA Chaos + Black Legion Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:55 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
IW Grand Company - added upgrade of 0-4 CSM.  To allow larger size Grand Company

If you don`t hit 20+ units i still consider this a tiny company  :laugh:  Iron Warriors Detachment would be a more proper name. In fact i see the whole army to be the Grand Company led by the Warsmith.

BL - I don't see any need to replace Imperial SHTs with obscurely referenced variants, if anything maybe replace the Shadowsword with the more siege orientated Stormsword
They are only name changes. Fellblade was the name of the more rounded looking Baneblade which Space Marines used before and during the Horus Heresy. Same for the Mammoth and Shadowsword.

@Thunderhawk;: Many Traitor Legion use Thunderhawks, Stormbirds and many other countless transport aircraft salvaged over the milennia. But as a siege army maybe they don't fit in the IronWarriors style of warfare. For szenarios like Planetstrike yes, but if they have already set foot on the planet they wouldn't be of much use during a siege.




_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:15 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:29 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Kraków Poland
You're right with the 0-x.  :agree:

'Iron Warriors Grand Company' should be the name of the whole army. Grand Companies are led by Warsmith's as BlackLegion mentioned. Also, during the first stage of the Iron Warriors Planetstrike the Thunderhawk should be allowed to be used, however Emplacements shouldn't.
How about we let the army either take the emplacements or the Gunship? This way you could either the the First Stage Iron Warriors army or the Second/Third Stage invasion phase with the same army list. :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Iron Warriors list?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:49 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Note that I have recommended the Stormsword's main gun to be upgraded from 30cm to 45cm range for the final version of Raiders, and Moscovian has I think agreed.

IIRC the only other change to the stats in the Minervan list is 'fixing the Stormhammer'.

Fellblade was the name of the more rounded looking Baneblade

Note that the Fellblade replaces its Lascannons with two more Twin Heavy Bolters.




_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 103 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

cron

Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net