Found the picture of my favorite Lander.
Move in Bulk the Guard Way!
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Imperial Landers http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=6789 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Moscovian [ Tue May 23, 2006 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Imperial Landers |
I know the Imperial Guard has had Landing Craft and other planetfalling transports brought up numerous times. The Pegasus and that soon-to-be-released Forgeworld troop carrier (can't remember what it's called) are two of them. Anyone have any stats written up on them? Ideas on how big the models should be? Descriptions? |
|
| Author: | dafrca [ Tue May 23, 2006 5:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Imperial Landers |
There has been a few drawings and an article about IG landers. When I get home tonight I will have to post one of my favorite drawings. dafrca |
|
| Author: | nealhunt [ Tue May 23, 2006 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Imperial Landers |
From the fairly early playtesting: COLOSSUS (Armageddon Pattern) <<< The Colossus is a large Imperial Guard orbital lander, designed to land Imperial Guard troops on hot landing zones. It is well armoured, but although similar in size to the Capitol Imperialis the need to minimise its weight means it is not nearly as sturdily built. >>> Type Speed Armour Close Combat Firefight War Engine Aircraft (bomber) 6+ 6+ 5+ Weapons: 4 x Twin Lascannon Turrets, 4 x Twin Multilaser Turrets Weapon Range Firepower Twin Lascannon 45cm AT4+ Twin Multilaser 30cm AP4+/AT5+/AA6+ Notes: Damage Capacity 4. Transport (may carry up to twenty of the following units: Imperial Guard units: Supreme Commander, Commander, Infantry, Storm Troopers, Fire Support, Snipers, Ogryns, Sentinels; plus up to three of the following units: Leman Russ, Vanquisher, Demolisher, Griffon, Hellhound). Reinforced Armour. Thick rear armour. Immune to panic. Critical Damage: Power conduits damaged, only six turrets may be fired from now on (attackers choice as to which) . Further critical hits cause an extra point of damage instead. | |
| Author: | dafrca [ Wed May 31, 2006 12:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Imperial Landers |
Found the picture of my favorite Lander. Move in Bulk the Guard Way!
|
|
| Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Wed May 31, 2006 2:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Imperial Landers |
I like it, dafrca. 
|
|
| Author: | semajnollissor [ Wed May 31, 2006 3:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Imperial Landers |
Here's a sketch I did at work one day (while not actually working). The style is supposed to be a cross between a T-hawk and an Imperial transport from BFG. So you know, each of the bays should be able to carry a Reaver. Each of the ghosted boxes in the silouette is supposed to be about the size of a tank.  
|
|
| Author: | Heresiarch [ Wed May 31, 2006 3:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Imperial Landers |
 Now thats what I call productive use of company time Semajnollissor. Seriously though... I like the concept. Nice and angular like an Imperial ship should be. |
|
| Author: | dafrca [ Wed May 31, 2006 10:13 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | Imperial Landers | ||
Nice, very nice. I like the way it ties in with the overall lok of existing minis and yet keeps a unique edge too. Well done. dafrca |
|||
| Author: | dafrca [ Wed May 31, 2006 10:14 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | Imperial Landers | ||
Came from one of the GW magazines, can't remember which at the moment. But it had an article with it as well. If anyone knows the referance, please sound off. dafrca |
|||
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|