Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu lists
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=33428
Page 5 of 5

Author:  RugII [ Sat Oct 05, 2019 8:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l

Largo_W wrote:
I am asking about the changes you put forward, DKOK Warhound and Baran


I need to check because it’s been a while, but from memory Baran and DKoK tweaks (the NDC ones) are also with ERC.... I should have a good opportunity to catch up with what’s going on next weekend.

If you’re looking for some sort of answer or definitive update immediately you’re going to be disappointed, give me a fortnight and a couple of PMs to keep me on task and we should get somewhere.

Author:  Dave [ Sat Oct 05, 2019 10:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l

This is all we got for DKoK and BSM:

Quote:
DKoK:
DKoK: Remove single warhounds from list.

Siege Masters:
Make Flak battery 150 points from current 100 points.
Bunkers become difficult terrain for WE:s with clarification that WE:s can't barge units out of bunkers.
Add no barging rule to trenches (se suggestion for bunkers).


Steve posted that on 2018-09-16, they were voted on, approved and in the TP the next day.

Author:  RugII [ Sun Oct 06, 2019 12:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l

Dave wrote:
This is all we got for DKoK and BSM:

Quote:
DKoK:
DKoK: Remove single warhounds from list.

Siege Masters:
Make Flak battery 150 points from current 100 points.
Bunkers become difficult terrain for WE:s with clarification that WE:s can't barge units out of bunkers.
Add no barging rule to trenches (se suggestion for bunkers).


Steve posted that on 2018-09-16, they were voted on, approved and in the TP the next day.


Yep, they’re the ones. Thanks Dave.

Author:  Largo_W [ Sun Oct 06, 2019 7:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l

Great, thanks for the update! Was a bit in muddy waters here as no update came through "here" :)

Looking forward to your update after the tourney!

Author:  junkstar [ Mon May 04, 2020 1:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l

Did the fire support for DKoK get adjusted also?

Latest PDF stafes 4 stands, Army builder states 6

Author:  Dave [ Mon May 04, 2020 1:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l

As far as I'm aware the TP is correct.

Author:  Darios [ Mon May 04, 2020 2:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l

Dave wrote:
As far as I'm aware the TP is correct.

so 4 bases is it... right? when did this change... as it was not listed in the changelog? (or i am just to blind to spot it somewhere)

Author:  jimmyzimms [ Mon May 04, 2020 2:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l

Not certain if that's actually a change. Checked the original published list from Epic: Siege and it was 4 units back then as well. Doesn't mean that it wasn't bumped to 6 at some point. Could have been a simple transcription error when put into army builder. OTOH Matt Shadowlord kinda had a habit of making "official" changes that never got actually approved. Could have been one of those. Might be worth digging through his posts?

edit:

pertinent posts I found on that topic in this section
https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 03#p631503
https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 19#p578919

From my digging it appears this 4-6 happened as part of Matt dreaming it up in this timeframe. Can't see anything discussing a it ever being put to a vote and actually approved.
https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 74&t=30347

Matt collates here what was approved from that pdf above
https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 68#p606068

Attachments:
Capture.PNG
Capture.PNG [ 65.1 KiB | Viewed 627 times ]

Page 5 of 5 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/