Gorethirster wrote:
5: Following up again, I think the destroyer's Laser destroyer should be AT3+, lance. Making it a macro weapon that follows the tourney pack rules doesn't seem right, because a laser destroyer is a lascannon on steroids and lascannons have no AP value.
There are 3 versions of the Laser Destroyer, none of them have any AP:
- Ulani's version: AT2+, Sniper (IMHO the best approach).
- Vraks' version: AT3+, MW. It is a MW (doesn't allow a save), but can't affect Infantry as it is an AT weapon. This is a good approach too.
- Minerva's version: AT4+, TK. It is a TK (doesn't allow any save), but can't affect Infantry as it is an AT weapon. This is the worst approach, very unreliable, and extremely overcosted on top of that.
Giving it Lance, I think is even a worse option, it would be extremely good against RA targets and not any good against normal tanks.
Edit: there's another option: use the profile of the Rapier Laser as a base.
_________________
Epic Armageddon in Spanish (from Spain):
http://www.box.net/shared/3u5vr8a370Konig Armoured Regiment FanList:
https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 41#p581941