| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Which SL list for the compendium? http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=23265 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Thu May 17, 2012 10:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which SL list for the compendium? |
I'd go for option 3 - Base off the EUK (Or NetEA - they're very similar) list, but fix where it's obviously gone wrong.  By which I mean a more radical NetEA version, I guess, that is braver with the cost cutting on some of the worse formations. Arty Co's are not worth 600pts - They're perhaps worth 500pts, for example. |
|
| Author: | Markconz [ Thu May 17, 2012 10:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which SL list for the compendium? |
I have not had time to fully digest the respective differences, but I think this is an interesting approach Rug. I look forward to seeing the results. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Thu May 17, 2012 11:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which SL list for the compendium? |
Quote: I think a unified EUK-NetEA list has a lot to offer the community... It doesn't offer the NetEA community a voice in design decisions however... NetEA community concerns about the list's balance would be entirely dependent on whether a few blokes in the north of england agreed with the worldwide majority sentiment. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Thu May 17, 2012 2:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which SL list for the compendium? |
*shrug* Both lists still have useless formations, if adopting the EUK list meant that they'd get tackled, I'd be for it. |
|
| Author: | Dave [ Thu May 17, 2012 2:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which SL list for the compendium? |
Rug wrote: Since the compendium has not been finalised yet, this provides you guys with an opportunity.... The 2012 compendium has been finalized, in terms of what changes are being introduced. We're only catching typos/errors at this point. For the 2013 compendium though your proposal still stands. Whatever changes do make it in, I'd like to see some battle reports though. I'm also fine with the NetEA and EpicUK lists being different, if even marginally. It's the same for the Orks I believe. |
|
| Author: | Dobbsy [ Thu May 17, 2012 2:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which SL list for the compendium? |
Well, if there have been minimal points drops on certain Guard units (have not yet seen the diffs) I'd say stick with NetEA. It's your list afterall.... It's not like EUK lists get played worldwide all that commonly. I think I can safely vouch for most of the Aussies when I say we use NetEA at all our tournaments (well the ones I've run and been to anyway). Make it your own mate. Carpe Diem and all that 
|
|
| Author: | wargame_insomniac [ Thu May 17, 2012 4:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which SL list for the compendium? |
The Net EA Compendium for 2013 has to have the Net EA SL list. However I see no harm in the next say six months playtesting the EUK changes and seeing if they appeal to worldwide community. It would be great in time if we can narrow the differences between EUK and Net EA but it has to be a 2-way process. It can't be simply be Net EA changing their lists to comply with EUK- it also had to involve EUK to make efforts to move closer to Net EA. Cheers James |
|
| Author: | Steve54 [ Thu May 17, 2012 5:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which SL list for the compendium? |
wargame_insomniac wrote: It would be great in time if we can narrow the differences between EUK and Net EA but it has to be a 2-way process. It can't be simply be Net EA changing their lists to comply with EUK- it also had to involve EUK to make efforts to move closer to Net EA. Cheers James That has already happened in a number of cases where EUk, TC + the ACs views have coincided. |
|
| Author: | wargame_insomniac [ Thu May 17, 2012 10:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which SL list for the compendium? |
Steve54 wrote: wargame_insomniac wrote: It would be great in time if we can narrow the differences between EUK and Net EA but it has to be a 2-way process. It can't be simply be Net EA changing their lists to comply with EUK- it also had to involve EUK to make efforts to move closer to Net EA. Cheers James That has already happened in a number of cases where EUk, TC + the ACs views have coincided. Thanks Steve- that is good news. |
|
| Author: | Apologist [ Wed May 23, 2012 3:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Which SL list for the compendium? |
wargame_insomniac wrote: [...] I see no harm in the next say six months playtesting the EUK changes and seeing if they appeal to worldwide community. It would be great in time if we can narrow the differences between EUK and Net EA but it has to be a 2-way process. It can't be simply be Net EA changing their lists to comply with EUK- it also had to involve EUK to make efforts to move closer to Net EA. Just wanted to chime in to echo this. It would be great if the two lists ended up identical, but there's a reason behind the distinction between the NetEA and EpicUK lists in general. I'd echo the suggestion to playtest the EUK changes in the NetEA environment, and come up with any further adjustments together. If an agreement can't be reached, no problem – the lists can continue to be differentiated; but I applaud Rug's proposal to try
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|