Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

[NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=19885		 Page 1 of 4
Author:  Chroma [ Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:57 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Greetings from the NetERC and the NetEA Project!

Please find attached the 2010 Draft of the Imperial Guard Army section of the NetEA Army Book. Please examine this document for typos, inconsistencies, and unclearness, or any other issues you may feel need to be resolved before final release. The EpicUK lists have not yet been included as I have not received any updated files. Lastly, Rug, what's your actual name?! *laugh*

Thank you!


This section includes the following armies:

STEEL LEGION IMPERIAL GUARD ARMY LIST - APPROVED

BARAN SIEGEMASTERS IMPERIAL GUARD ARMY LIST - APPROVED

MINERVAN TANK LEGION ARMOURED REGIMENT IMPERIAL GUARD ARMY LIST - APPROVED

DEATH KORPS OF KRIEG SIEGE REGIMENT IMPERIAL GUARD ARMY LIST - APPROVED

CADIAN 'SHOCK TROOP' IMPERIAL GUARD ARMY LIST - IN DEVELOPMENT

SARANES EXPANSE IMPERIAL CRUSADE ARMY LIST - IN DEVELOPMENT

ARMAGEDDON ORK HUNTER AIR CAVALRY IMPERIAL GUARD ARMY LIST

CATACHAN DEATHWORLD VETERANS IMPERIAL GUARD ARMY LIST - EXPERIMENTAL

ELYSIAN DROP TROOP REGIMENT IMPERIAL GUARD ARMY LIST - EXPERIMENTAL

SAVLAR CHEM-DOG CONSCRIPT REGIMENT IMPERIAL GUARD ARMY LIST


If there are lists you feel have been missed, please feel free to contact myself, Rug, or any other members of the NetERC.

Attachments:
2010 - NetEA-ArmyCompendiumS1.2 - Imperial Guard.pdf [310.06 KiB]
Downloaded 1836 times
Author:  adam77 [ Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Minor stuff...
DKOK: banding is missing on Support table.
Cadian: 'Karskin Platoon' is spelled incorrectly; 'Karskin Elite Platoon' also.
Elysian: points columns are wonky.
Minervan,Elysian,Salvar: some of the unit/upgrade names are not bolded in the first column.

Also, The 'Version: FINAL 2010' convention is used in this document but not in the others.
Author:  GlynG [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Quote:
Imperial Guard Infantry lose their Autocannon, and all Commander, Fire
Support, and Supreme Commander units have one Autorcannon replaced by a
Twin Heavy Stubber


Typo on the second Autocannon there and I'd change "one Autorcannon" to read "their Autocannons" as otherwise someone could be left with the incorrect impression that a Kreig Fire Support team has one of each. Ignore the latter part, I was wrong and they do have one of each.
Author:  Angel_of_Caliban [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Macharius Command Tank Weapons table is off...

Also I don't see any list using the Malcador Tank, is that just me??
Author:  Chroma [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
GlynG wrote:
Quote:
Imperial Guard Infantry lose their Autocannon, and all Commander, Fire
Support, and Supreme Commander units have one Autorcannon replaced by a
Twin Heavy Stubber


Typo on the second Autocannon there and I'd change "one Autorcannon" to read "their Autocannons" as otherwise someone could be left with the incorrect impression that a Kreig Fire Support team has one of each.

Well, looking at the .pdf of Siege I got from TacComms, the Kreig Fire Support team does have one Autocannon and one Twin Heavy Stubber which is why I wrote it that way.

Is that a typo in Siege? Or is there another version of the .pdf out there?
Author:  GlynG [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Sorry Chroma - ignore me, I was mistaken/mis-remembering.
Author:  Chroma [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Angel_of_Caliban wrote:
Also I don't see any list using the Malcador Tank, is that just me??

It's used in a Vraks Traitor Guard list... but it is "originally" an Imperial unit, so, there it is!

Maybe someone will be inspired by it.
Author:  GlynG [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Are there no stats for a Capital Imperialis? I'll be disappointed and surprised if its not been included in one of the imperial guard lists.
Author:  Angel_of_Caliban [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Chroma wrote:
Angel_of_Caliban wrote:
Also I don't see any list using the Malcador Tank, is that just me??

It's used in a Vraks Traitor Guard list... but it is "originally" an Imperial unit, so, there it is!

Maybe someone will be inspired by it.

That's what I thought....figured they be in the Chaos Section tho....Would they fit in a Krieg Amour List?

Quick! Put the the "Wolf Symbol" in the Sky!
Author:  GlynG [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
That's what I thought....figured they be in the Chaos Section tho....Would they fit in a Krieg Amour List? [/quote]

Nope, sorry - Krieg don't use them. I would be keen to see Krieg Armoured list though and I think E&C had said he planned to at some point.
Author:  Borka [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
EDIT: Never mind I missed that AoC had already pointed this out.

The Macharius command tank has a little glitch in its weapons range and firepower stats.
They are one line to low now in comparision to the weapon names. It's looks like this.


2 × Vanquisher cannons OR 75cm AP4+/AT2+
Vulcan Megabolter
2 × Heavy Bolters 45cm 4 × AP3+/AT5+
Twin Heavy Stubber 30cm AP5+
30cm AP5+


Those two heavy boltes are very powerful and the vulcan feels a bit left out ;) :P

cheers
Author:  BlackLegion [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
Its "Salamander COmmand" not "Salamander Commander"

What is a Land Crawler? The name of the towing vehicle the Baran use is Bruennhilde.
Also the Baran list mentiones Blitzen AA Guns, but there is only a Heavy AA Gun Weapon Platform in the summary.

Why is the Quad Launcher udner the Experimental Imperial Guard Infantry heade? It is used by the DKoK which is a Apporved list.

In the DKoK list you forgot the grey background bars in the Support Formation table.
Author:  Spectrar Ghost [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
The Bruenhilde is a type of Land Crawler. I expect the stat lines for those and the Heavy AA were identical, and were consolidated.
Author:  Borka [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
The Death Korps engineer units mole launcher, has no AP or AT value, the firepower column just says ignore cover.

cheers
Author:  Dave [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [NetEA] Imperial Guard Army Section - DRAFT 2010
I didn't realize the Chem-dogs and Ork Hunters were in this. They look a few versions old though.

Would you mind removing them? When I have a chance to test them properly I'll put them forward but I don't think armies so untested really need to be in the compendium. If anyone is interested in them I'll just direct them to the wiki.
Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/