I like bits of moo
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=15624 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | zombocom [ Tue May 19, 2009 6:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
Entirely unconnected to the likely future availability of a Malcafloor tank, should the Mossinian list get access to the Malcador varients? Personally I think they're a good fit with the older-tech style of the list. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Tue May 19, 2009 6:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
Verily I hafe voted nae. |
|
| Author: | GlynG [ Tue May 19, 2009 6:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
Against your own Malcadors? Shame on you... They're not necessary certainly, but do you not think they kind of fit with the theme of the list? |
|
| Author: | zombocom [ Tue May 19, 2009 6:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
E&C is against the idea because he doesn't want it to look like he's pushing his own merchandise. Quite understandable, but they do fir nicely in the list and would help to give it a unique character it is currently missing. |
|
| Author: | lookatmybiglongname [ Tue May 19, 2009 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
I like bits of moo
|
|
| Author: | GlynG [ Tue May 19, 2009 6:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
But will we need to invent another separate low-tech guard list for them to go in? How many such lists do we need? Perhaps the ohter list could be called the Moo-sinians to keep you beef lovers happy? ;-) (I can't comment; I've never eaten the poor quadrupeds) |
|
| Author: | lookatmybiglongname [ Tue May 19, 2009 10:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
How about the 'medium-rare-prime-aged-stake-and-chip-ians'. Though the nids probably went through them in short order. |
|
| Author: | Pulsar [ Wed May 20, 2009 7:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
BEEF! with roast potato's! and homemade gravy! |
|
| Author: | Man of kent [ Wed May 20, 2009 9:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
A Nae from me too i'm afraid; although old they're too 'imperial' in design and the mossinians are so shockinly equipped i doubt even Malcadors are somehting they'd be equipped with; perhaps leave them for some sort of crusading guard list or a 'dark ages' kind of thing? Don't know... HOWEVER: what does strike me is that the battle cannon variant would make a grrreat stand in for the Ragnorok no? My other feeling is that adding a whole new unit at this stage would delay release and cause further debate. |
|
| Author: | vytzka [ Wed May 20, 2009 11:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
Yay beef. This poll cracks me up. But I honestly don't care one way or another 
|
|
| Author: | Honda [ Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
I voted "no" for another reason. E&C has posted a Vraks IG traitors list that I think has a lot of potential. Part of that potential is the miniatures it can feature which don't exist anywhere else. I'd prefer to see the Vraks traitors feature the M-class tanks, much like we'd expect to see things like Gorgons in the Krieg and not somewhere else. I realize I am steering things to emulate the IA Vraks books, but again, I see that as a good thing. Let the Mossinians be. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Should the Mossinian list get Malcadors? |
Can we delete this old thread please. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|