Minervan Review |
|
Evil and Chaos
|
Post subject: Minervan Review  Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:10 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
|
|
Indeed I think it's been agreed by most that TK status was an error.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
BlackLegion
|
Post subject: Minervan Review Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:14 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
 |
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
|
|
And then we have two MW tanks in the list.
On with great range and good against vehicles (Destroyer Tank Hunter).
And one with medium range and average against all (Leman Russ Executioner).
If this isn't seen as a problem: Fine.
If this is seen as a problem then: Look at my proposed stats for the Leman Russ Executioner above. But you hsould note thatthe to-hit values derived frommy Plasma Cannon proposal (AP4+AT4+ Slow-firing changing to AP4+/AT6+)
_________________ We are returned! http://www.epic-wargaming.de/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Moscovian
|
Post subject: Minervan Review Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:51 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
 |
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
|
|
As Neal put it, it may be best to leave it alone. I throw that opinion out there because I want to make sure that the stat changes we're making are necessary. Are we tweaking them to satisfy some 40K nuance or are we modifying them to fix a glaring error in the list? Will fixing them unbalance the list?
I don't know the answer to these questions and -to my knowledge- nobody has tested these things.
_________________ author of Syncing Forward and other stories...It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
