Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Grey Knights sub-AC required http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=73&t=24236 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Dobbsy [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Grey Knights sub-AC required |
As of today, Fattdex will be stepping down as the Grey Knights sub-AC. Is anyone keen to take up the mantle and give some love to the boys in silver-grey and brass? Current list is here: viewtopic.php?f=73&t=20488 |
Author: | Meer [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
Do the Grey Knights really merit a stand alone list given they only come out in army force once every few thousand years? Surely a role as allies in an inquistion (or other) force makes far more sense. OK finished flogging my no doubt dead horse now. |
Author: | Dobbsy [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
Meer wrote: Do the Grey Knights really merit a stand alone list given they only come out in army force once every few thousand years? Surely a role as allies in an inquistion (or other) force makes far more sense. ![]() |
Author: | Angel_of_Caliban [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
Meer wrote: Do the Grey Knights really merit a stand alone list given they only come out in army force once every few thousand years? Surely a role as allies in an inquisition (or other) force makes far more sense. Nope, we have plenty of other Space Marines lists to worry about then a arm of the Inquisition that happened to be Space Marines. I hope the Inquisition list get more traction. |
Author: | Moscovian [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
On a technical point, wouldn't this fall under the Inquisition AC (Dwarf Supreme)? Sisters, Gray Knights, Death Watch (and Ordo Xenos in general) are all Inquisition as I undrstood it... |
Author: | Meer [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
Moscovian wrote: On a technical point, wouldn't this fall under the Inquisition AC (Dwarf Supreme)? Sisters, Gray Knights, Death Watch (and Ordo Xenos in general) are all Inquisition as I undrstood it... That's kind of what I was getting at, it seems there are plenty of potential Astartes chapters that this group could be focusing on, leaving the GK to their inquisition support role. |
Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
Moscovian wrote: On a technical point, wouldn't this fall under the Inquisition AC (Dwarf Supreme)? Sisters, Gray Knights, Death Watch (and Ordo Xenos in general) are all Inquisition as I undrstood it... That's a good point. |
Author: | Dobbsy [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
All yours to deal with then, DS. Good luck. ![]() CS - can you please move the Grey Knights threads over to DS control/Inq. Forum? Once you've done that I'll delete this thread. Cheers |
Author: | Moscovian [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
Dobbsy, Not that you are incapable of handling the Gray Knights... Only that we now have an Inquisition AC. I think the GK got stuffed over in your area before Dwarf Supreme was appointed. |
Author: | Dobbsy [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
No, no, fully understand and not upset. Should I have included a happy face in that post? ![]() |
Author: | jimmyzimms [ Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
![]() ![]() |
Author: | Dobbsy [ Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
Edited for correctness |
Author: | Moscovian [ Wed Nov 14, 2012 5:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Grey Knights sub-AC required |
I was just worried I offended you. Glad I did not. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |