Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
[NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=73&t=19864 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Chroma [ Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:39 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 | ||
Greetings from the NetERC and the NetEA Project! Please find attached the 2010 Draft of the Space Marine Army section of the NetEA Army Book. Please examine this document for typos, inconsistencies, and unclearness, or any other issues you may feel need to be resolved before final release. Thank you! This section includes the following armies: CODEX ASTARTES SPACE MARINE ARMY LIST - APPROVED WHITE SCARS SPACE MARINE ARMY LIST - APPROVED SCIONS OF IRON SPACE MARINE ARMY LIST - APPROVED SALAMANDERS SPACE MARINE ARMY LIST - APPROVED BLACK TEMPLARS SPACE MARINE ARMY LIST - IN DEVELOPMENT BLOOD ANGELS SPACE MARINE ARMY LIST - IN DEVELOPMENT RAVEN GUARD SPACE MARINE ARMY LIST - EXPERIMENTAL SPACE WOLVES SPACE MARINE ARMY LIST - EXPERIMENTAL If there are lists you feel have been missed, please feel free to contact myself, Hena, or any other members of the NetERC.
|
Author: | Angel_of_Caliban [ Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
I'm sad not to see Dark Angels in that list. But that's probably because there is a lack of agreement and push or AC at all. Its more of a confusing mess. *Sigh* Even it Epic my Angels get shafted...lol! |
Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
They to be honest with a conservative terminator option can go as approved. As it is I'm sure they will turn up as in development. I'll do a new list to reflect neals land raider suggestion and drop the assault terminators (have 4-6 normal instead) once I've gone through the whole thread and answered all the points - saying that I can't imagine much will change. As for AC's its the same as the salamanders so we can't be all that bad ![]() |
Author: | frogbear [ Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
With regard to this: Quote: 1.1.5 PENDING SPACE MARINE ARMIES These are lists that are either in early stages of development, lying fallow, or currently unsubmitted to the NetEA Project. Please let us know if you think we’ve missed any, and if you’ve got ideas for new, or improved, lists, we’d be glad to hear from you! APOCRYPHA OF SKAROS – Simon “Simulated Knave” Jack DARK ANGELS - Unknown IMPERIAL FISTS – Andrew “Frogbear” Palermo IRON HANDS – Chris “The Real Chris” Hayes Imp Fists are highly experimental at this stage, however I will get you the list later today. If anything, they have had a few playtests. I will 1. remove a Terminator variant 2. make a final decision on the assault terminator stats Everything else, after the changes above should be fine to be left for a year. |
Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
Oh and I'll do it in word this time ![]() |
Author: | frogbear [ Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
I have just sent the Imperial Fists as a word doc to Chroma Changes made to lock the document in for its inclusion: - Removed standard Terminators as an option - Replaced Terminator Assault stats with CC2+ EA+1MW, FF0, and Invulnerable Save (As suggested by E&C - Termies no longer have 2x MW attacks) As most of the list has standard Marine units (and the Achilles which has been greatly toned down and possibly over priced), there should be no issues with balance and costings. All Marine units should be in line with everything Hena has layed down as standard. Cheers.... |
Author: | BlackLegion [ Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
You have to mention that the Salamanders Tacticals and Devastators have different FF values than their non-Salamanders counterparts. Salamanders Tacticals FF = 5+ (instead of 4+) Salamanders Devastators FF = 4+ (instead of 3+) But the rest looks fine. Thank you for your work Chroma ![]() |
Author: | Man of kent [ Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
Coming along swimmingly :-) |
Author: | frogbear [ Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
Hena wrote: Imperial Fists: This list has been around for a month or so, so wasn't going to include it immediately. My main drive has been with lists that are finished or nearly so, not include every experimental thing there is. Hena I would ask you to reconsider this as most of the units are standard Marine so most have the playtests to be seen as balanced. The rest are in line (costing and balance) with your normal Marine units as well. Just because it has only been out a short time (more than a month actually) does not mean many hours worth of work has not been poured into it's development to get it up to speed. I even have no less than 3 playtests with the list which is more than I can say for some others being included in the NetEA project. The Doc I sent Chroma (and now yourself) is ready to be 'locked' for a year. Can I please have you reconsider this. Thank you |
Author: | Dave [ Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
What happened to halving BMs for assault in TSKNF? The THawk should be able to transport attack bikes as well. Also, a few of them are listed as Bomber and others as just "B". For the White Scars shouldn't Tacticals have the Vindicator and Hunter Upgrades? Same for the Terminators? And Vindicators for Assault? Also, why are Hunters 50 points there? Their Attack Bikes never had walker, did they? Trying to remember. |
Author: | Chroma [ Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
Dave wrote: The THawk should be able to transport attack bikes as well. Attack Bikes have a note saying they count as Bikes for transport purposes. Quote: Their Attack Bikes never had walker, did they? Trying to remember. Just regular White Scars Bikes have walker. |
Author: | Dave [ Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: [NetEA] Space Marine Army Section - DRAFT 2010 |
Well that's a lovely piece of Errata. ![]() I guess I'll start a separate topic for this then, as there's a few things to consider. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |