Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 182 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 13  Next

Space Marine Ground-Pounders

 Post subject: Space Marine Ground-Pounders
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:09 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Quote: (Rug @ Nov. 24 2009, 10:48 )

I disagree with the basic premise of this thread (the marine list can't ground pound), but accept there are problems with Preds and Tacs

And Vindicator formations, and Land Raider formations, and ground-based Assault formations, and also Warhound Titans (still too cheap at 275pts IMO), and probably more... :)


It's good to see this thread topic arise again. :)

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Space Marine Ground-Pounders
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:35 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 7:27 pm
Posts: 5602
Location: Bristol
Quote: (Mephiston @ Nov. 24 2009, 12:03 )

As Honda says you have to leave all the 40k marine ideas behind when you get to epic.

Surely the failing is with the poorly designed epic SM list rather than W40k marine ideas? Epic lists should aim to match their W40k counterparts and background and this one has always been lacking in terms of the breadth of competitive lists.

It might need testing and balancing but I am definitely behind the all-arms marine list and the reasoning for it. I'm not disputing Marines are hard for newcomers to play or that you get into it after a while and they can be competitive and do very well at ultra-competitive play.

The problem rather is internal balance issues between units in the list which are too good, or too poor, and that a ground based army isn't competitive enough - the general idea of this list is to make a ground based marine list a bit more competitive while leaving the more airbourne style around the same, is that really such a bad thing? Would have a wider range of competitive lists to play with and against not be a good thing and make SM more interesting?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Space Marine Ground-Pounders
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:17 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:52 pm
Posts: 4262
In the UK tournament records I can't remember a Marine list without titans of one sort or another placing in the top half (I should know, Its normally me without the titans :) and I shall once again be trying at this weekends GT)

I've got over my "mud marines should work stance" of 2 years ago. When the Imperium wants a force to go toe to toe on the ground they call in the guard. Want a lightning strike to decapitate the enemy, send in the Marines.

Can marines win with a pure ground force? Yes, but you better play a blinding game as your not playing to your strengths.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Space Marine Ground-Pounders
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:20 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Quote: 

The point is that Marines don't shoot very much. You can get around this by putting more units on the ground, but that isn't special forces anymore. Then you can play like IG and the whole point of being Marines gets diluted. Marines aren't a line force. They don't behave like that. In 40k everything behaves like that as it's the nature of the game. In epic that isn't a requirement so armies can behave differently.

The problem is of course that the core Codex army list in the rulebook claims it is able to be used in both an air assault and a ground pounding style.

Clearly, the rulebook is incorrect, and the list a partial failure.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Space Marine Ground-Pounders
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:27 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
But it is inferior, ergo the list is flawed.

It is no coincidence that the greater majority of NetEA changes apply to ground based units, not airbourne ones.




_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Space Marine Ground-Pounders
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:32 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Quote: 

Is this unfluffy or stilted?

As ever, the 'fluffy' choice would be to base your army around a battle company, to whit:

- Tactical Formation
- Tactical Formation
- Devestator Formation
- Assault Formation

And then fill out the rest of your army as you like. The greater majority (like 90%) of Marine actions in the background consist of a battle company undertaking a mission, reinforced if nessesary with units from other companies, but always with a battle company as the core of the army.

That Tactical formations are only really useful as bodyguards for Supreme Commanders, and are not useful in their own right as a battle formation, is another failing of the list, of course.


You could make a respectable argument to say that your list is an 8th company army, as a decent number of your formations would use marines from that company (Assault, Assault, Land Speeder, Bike)... but it certainly isn't a 'typical' Marine army according to the background, as the 8th Company is normally used in support of a Battle Company, not the other way around.




_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Space Marine Ground-Pounders
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:34 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:52 pm
Posts: 4262
If you consider Rug's army to be a Blood Angels successor or such like then the lack of dev's and higher numbers of assault formations is fluffy.

I'm taking the following to the GT

Tactical
Tactical
Dev + Hunter + SC
Assualt
Terminators
Scout + 2 x Las Razorbacks
Strike Cruiser
Landing Craft
Thunderhawk
Thunderhawk
Thunderbolt
Thunderbolt

So the Battle company plus friends basically. Lots of deployment options available.

Will I do well? Doubt it, lots of Eldar in play.





Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Space Marine Ground-Pounders
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:40 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Quote: (Mephiston @ Nov. 24 2009, 13:34 )

If you consider Rug's army to be a Blood Angels successor or such like then the lack of dev's and higher numbers of assault formations is fluffy.

Except for the bit where Blood Angels have no more Assault Marines than any other Marine Chapter, or the bit where they have just as many Devestators as other Marine Chapters, sure.  :grin:

Like I said, you can make an argument for it being an 8th company army from any vaguely Codex-adherent Chapter.




_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Space Marine Ground-Pounders
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:41 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Quote: (Rug @ Nov. 24 2009, 13:40 )

Quote: (Evil and Chaos @ Nov. 24 2009, 13:27 )

But it is inferior, ergo the list is flawed.

It is no coincidence that the greater majority of NetEA changes apply to ground based units, not airbourne ones.

It's no coincidence the only pure ground based marine unit are Landspeeders? The rest can be airbourne.

Ergo your logic is flawed!

Context is everything ; how many air-dropped Whirlwind formations have you ever seen.  :grin:

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Space Marine Ground-Pounders
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:42 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:52 pm
Posts: 4262
I've been tempted a few times, but my landing craft has only just been painted!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 182 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 13  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net