I think their abilities are very different from regular Terminators and that they definitely deserve to be represented. I'm a bit baffled by the assertion Assault Terminators aren't any good and I disagree myself. They're definitely specialised, but are better at what they do and I'd happily take them over regular Terminators for the same cost any day.
Most Terminator formations are upgraded with a Chaplain as they're an excellent combination. If you compared the amount of a hits a formation of Terminators or Assault Terminators with a Chaplain gets the Assault Terminators with their better 2+ CC get 0.6 more regular hits and 0.83 more MW hits. Against enemies with 4+ saves say that equates to 25% more kills from the Assault Terminators, which seems pretty good to me. Please no 2 x MW! That would be overpowered, disproportionate and isn't needed. Plus they also have invulnerable saves so take less damage, it may be only a 6+ but it still makes a difference.
Ironhelm wrote:
Note that the v4.1 Black Templars list has gone too far imho by FORCING the player to only use Assault Terminators and as I posted elsewhere, these are practically useless against skimmer armies holding objectives/BTS such as the case with Eldar, Dark Eldar, Necron, Tau.
Epic lists with variant Terminators have generally replaced them rather than having both e.g. the Salamanders list has Salamanders list has Salamander Terminators (with Heavy Flamers) instead of regular Terminators. I'm not suggesting the Black Templars don't have regular Terminators but as a chapter they are themed much more towards assault than Codex marines, and Assault Terminators fit the theme better than regular Terminators. House ruling them to have either seems a good idea, though I reckon you've made them overly powerful myself.
Given that they teleport or fly in on aircraft they should be able to initially target ground troops even in a mostly skimming army. Even against a very rare all skimmer army (Saim-hann say) they're not then useless. A player could get blast markers(s) prepped, some FF support in place and use them as a tough unit to teleport in and initiate a clipping assault on an important target without taking much damage.
Dobbsy wrote:
So far I lean towards making Assault Termies an optional replacement to Tactical Termies in all lists who use them, rather than cutting them completely.
Interesting idea, perhaps. I'd be happy to see them generally added or at least tested. Would the formation have to be all Assault Terminators OR regular ones (like some unit options in other SM lists) or a free mix? I'm cautious of the latter as I suspect a mix of the two would be better than either current mono-sorts and that characters would often optimally be placed with Assault Terminators to maximise the MW hits.
If you end up doing a 2014 revision to the Codex Astartes list can I suggest the previously well supported cheaper LS Typhoon be included too? If you're particularly open to change switching Scout's transport to the Land Speeder Storm would be great too.