Ulrik wrote:
Mostly 'cause I think the background for modern neurons suck.
The background has barely changed. The only difference I can think of is that now instead of the C'tan being free agents in command of the Necrons, now the Necrons are in control of the C'tan. This actually fits 40k's overarching main theme ("Everything is lesser than once it was" / "The entropy of greatness") that runs through 90% of their armies much better IMO.
On the tabletop itself, the army functions little different to how it used to. The new background has little practical impact on the gameplay.
Quote:
It's not a given that I'll try to add them.
I wouldn't bother, the Raiders list is finished. No need to poke it to any great degree (and adding new units is a great degree).
I can see a good rationale for a new army list - the Raiders list ends up being a "Necrons as they were in the great war against the Eldar" list, and the new army list would represent Necrons as they are in the current 40k timeline. And there is a lot of cool stuff available now.
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Warhammer-40000/Necronshttp://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catal ... tyle=wh40khttp://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catal ... od2130076aLook at all that cool!
I'm sure that 3rd party proxies could be found, or conversion guides recommended. It wouldn't be as tough a job as the original Raiders list was to make. You might even find companies will work with your requirements to help you make suitable models that don't break IP rules.