Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Conversion numbers and materials http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=25235 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | madd0ct0r [ Mon May 27, 2013 11:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Conversion numbers and materials |
Might turn into a useful resource: Trying to model: auto cannon Tube diameter ~ 0.5mm Suggestion: Staples. |
Author: | GlynG [ Tue May 28, 2013 12:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conversion numbers and materials |
It's a good idea, but would need a LOT more detail to be useful. Taking say a plastic imperial guard autocannon you'd need to give length and diameter meaurements for the gun barrel and the end piece, plus measurements for the gun shield and rear part and the ammo container. It would be best to list as precise as possible measurements from the 40k model as people can then choose how accurately to model their version. There's not just one autocannon though, but many and there'd be a whole different set of measurements for a Krieg autocannon: ![]() Or a SM autocannon: ![]() Lastly did you mean Staples as in the office supplie store? Do they sell plasticard and plastic-rod? I hope you didn't mean actual metal staples for autocannons... |
Author: | madd0ct0r [ Tue May 28, 2013 9:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conversion numbers and materials |
why not? ![]() |
Author: | Lead-Space [ Tue May 28, 2013 11:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conversion numbers and materials |
Aren't they a little difficult to handle? Sharp and all. What parts would you make out of staples? Interesting idea. |
Author: | Apocolocyntosis [ Tue May 28, 2013 2:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conversion numbers and materials |
I rarely use a stapler, but most staples i see are not circular in cross section, instead tending to be more along the lines of a rounded off rectangle? |
Author: | madd0ct0r [ Tue May 28, 2013 3:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conversion numbers and materials |
good point. they look ok here though: ![]() biro tubing tends to be 3mm at minimum. What else would you suggest for smaller work? |
Author: | Apocolocyntosis [ Tue May 28, 2013 5:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conversion numbers and materials |
madd0ct0r wrote: biro tubing tends to be 3mm at minimum. What else would you suggest for smaller work? If we are discounting brass rod, styrene rod, and similar 'conventional' solutions for more home/diy materials, you can make your own plastic rod to any thickness you want by stretching sprue. GW sprue had the wrong cross section, but sprue stretching is an easy way to make your own range of cross section plastics at custom thicknesses. Also, try the bristles from plastic brooms and brushes, get one in a £-shop and chop away, might not take glue well though. Different toughnesses of brush for different plastic thickness. |
Author: | madd0ct0r [ Tue May 28, 2013 8:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Conversion numbers and materials |
oooh. that's clever. I've spent too many years living far away from any model shops, didn't even occur to me they'd stock rod in such small sections. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |