is this too fine detail to print/cast?
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Just dabbling for now http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=19419 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | madd0ct0r [ Fri Oct 15, 2010 3:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Just dabbling for now |
is this too fine detail to print/cast?
|
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
Finest detail I like to work in is 0.2mm. Any details below that tend to become unreliable. |
|
| Author: | Otterman [ Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
Word for that. I tend to avoid anything smaller than .3mm. So, working on an Ordinatus, are we? |
|
| Author: | Athmospheric [ Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
On that subject, I'd love to be able to find a good track unit to build large stuff like Ordinatus and Capitol Imperialis class Super heavies from. I always envision such things as having multiple separate track units (4 like the giant NASA land crawler, or even possibly 6). |
|
| Author: | semajnollissor [ Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
You know, most vehicles with treads have more a complex tread arrangement than the flat-with-circular-ends arrangement that you show. There are various reasons for this. Changing the tread geometry would go a long way towards making something look less toy-like. Even if the old ordinatus had treads like that. |
|
| Author: | madd0ct0r [ Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
off to wikipedia! damn. the 'various other reasons' were not explicitly discussed. could you elucidate me? I could argue that being 2.5 marines high - anything the tracks can't already climb is probably to big for a large unwieldy vehicle to mount. As it was 8 separate bogies seem to make sense, it's the only way to keep a semblance of mobility. I understand the 'toy-like' comment and that is something to probably avoid. All my source material shows flat tracks though. Any good ideas will be ruthlessly stolen. |
|
| Author: | Athmospheric [ Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
Well, having wheels as high as the whole track unit, specially at the ends, would nullify part of the flexibility of the track itself, and certainly wouldn't provide as much traction over rough terrain, while making the unit more fragile. That is one of the reason why almost all tracked military vehicles have trapezoid shaped tracks. In particular, the powering wheels don't have to be indirect contact with the ground. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
I'd like to see a CI done up similar to the concept sketches that were done for E:A before Fanatic got shut down.   
|
|
| Author: | madd0ct0r [ Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
And it's a slow day at work. Experimenting with the Conflagration Cannon Position. Ignore the tracks for now, they're up for later reworking It's a 5 Barrage Plate piece of heavy ordanance.      Ahh, we have a winner! There will be an internal courtyard, with appropriate detailing.  With Excommunication Launchers and a little more detailing added. Model will be 120mm long in Epic. Detail down to 0.3mm Only viable way to produce will be a plastic extruder type 3d printer. |
|
| Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
I'm not sold on the ginormous mortar. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Fri Nov 05, 2010 1:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
Quote: Model will be 120mm long in Epic. Detail down to 0.3mm Only viable way to produce will be a plastic extruder type 3d printer. Design it right and you could do a model that size with printapart for a reasonable cost. |
|
| Author: | madd0ct0r [ Fri Nov 05, 2010 3:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
lots of thin panels? does print-a-part charge on outer volume or plastic volume? could i make sections of it hollowed out? |
|
| Author: | Otterman [ Fri Nov 05, 2010 3:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
Mostly outer volume. Hollowing helps a little bit, but it's probably not worth the effort. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Fri Nov 05, 2010 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
I know Jonluke saved a decent chunk by hollowing out the legs of his LWR. By making it from several components, you could probably reduce the cost quite a bit. Alternatively, you could plastic-extrude the interior "hull" and then use a higher quality service to print "detail panels" which are designed to be glued to the surface of the master model. |
|
| Author: | Legion 4 [ Fri Nov 05, 2010 4:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Just dabbling for now |
Looks like ... if the Vatican was designing an ORGE ...  
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|