Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

The Raubtier
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=18207
Page 2 of 20

Author:  Otterman [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

That's all. The styling of the turret may be different.

Author:  BlackLegion [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

The difference is only some non-ordered iconography. If you want some more...hm..organic fleshmachines then you have to use green stuff.

Author:  Legion 4 [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

Good to know ... Thanks !! :D

Author:  berzerkmonkey [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

Otterman wrote:
That's all. The styling of the turret may be different.

I would like this - it would set the non-ordered version apart. Maybe something a little "blockier." There is a 10,000 year difference, you know ;)

Additionally, the offering of Nik's original turret as an additional part would be outstanding for those of us with tons of extra Ordered APCs... ;D

Author:  Otterman [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

I'll make a separate production mold for the turret, so spare parts will be possible.

Is an autocannon version necessary, desirable, or redundant?
Same question, lascannon sponsons?

Should I put non-ordered iconography on the sponsons?

Author:  berzerkmonkey [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

Otterman wrote:
I'll make a separate production mold for the turret, so spare parts will be possible.

Yay!

Otterman wrote:
Is an autocannon version necessary, desirable, or redundant?
Same question, lascannon sponsons?

Well. the NO version only has the twin-lascannon and heavy bolters, so IMO, they would be unnecessary. I can't speak for other members though, obviously.

As for the Ordered version, there are the two variants, so, if you do a set, I would think both would be desirable.

Otterman wrote:
Should I put non-ordered iconography on the sponsons?

Where would it go? On the top of the sponson? And could you even tell what it is at that scale?

Author:  Dave [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

Iconography-free freem and riveter sponsons, and twin freem and dakka cannon turrets would be very useful for conversions. Of course if the iconography was easily filed off that would work too.

Author:  Otterman [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

Nope, not enough room on sponson for iconography. Just checked.

Author:  Otterman [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

WIP

Attachments:
Raubtier 23.jpg
Raubtier 23.jpg [ 130.94 KiB | Viewed 636 times ]

Author:  Spectrar Ghost [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

The turret detail is good, but I dislike the drum mags on the, erm, riveters. They look too much like gears at this point. Perhaps rounding the shells and adding edges to make it look like they are held in by something?

Author:  zap123 [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

As a counter opinion, I like the drum feeds. The gear look would be easily corrected by painting if it offends, and I for one think it looks way cool.

Author:  Legion 4 [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

I've like these turret types - Image

Author:  Angel_of_Caliban [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

Legion 4 wrote:
I've like these turret types - Image

Really???

I think they look like poo, no offense L4.

Author:  Legion 4 [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

Or this one ... #4 ... Image

Author:  Legion 4 [ Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Raubtier

Angel_of_Caliban wrote:
Legion 4 wrote:
I've like these turret types - Image

Really???

I think they look like poo, no offense L4.

Well I did replaced a badly cast las-cannon with a 15mm WWI MG ... ;D

Page 2 of 20 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/