Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
FW Ork Battlewagons http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=15755 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | daemonkin [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
Guys, Anyone got a comparison pic of the FW and SG battlewagons. I suspect the FW ones are bigger but could they be used as battlefortresses instead? D. |
Author: | clausewitz [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
I bought a few FW zap cannon gunwagons recently. I don't have any pics but I can tell you that although they are a little bigger (than the old plastic wagons), they are not anything like as big as a super-heavy. |
Author: | fredmans [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
I suspect the question was asked because the FW Battlewagons are 15£ for 3, compared to 3 Gunwagonz for 5£. It suggests a size difference, which I am interested in myself. What could they be used for? Are they worth it? The SG Battlewagonz are about the same size as the SG Gunwagonz, differing somewhat between different models. /Fredmans |
Author: | daemonkin [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
Yes Fredmans you hit the proverbial nail. £15 for 3 implies something comparable in size to the baneblades / other super heavies. A picture of 1 with another model would be great. Can anyone on TacComms help? I know someone can... ![]() D. |
Author: | Titivillus [ Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
I don't have pics, but if you look here, you will see little orcs on the guns. Extrapolating from that, they would be super-heavy sized, I believe. |
Author: | Ghudra [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:18 am ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
Hope this helps: |
Author: | Legion 4 [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:42 am ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
Yup ... a got a couple too ... Dey B BIG Mutha's !! ![]() ![]() |
Author: | daemonkin [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:16 am ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
Thanks Ghudra, they look almost compatible with WE-sized vehicles. Cheers. D. |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:19 am ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
Looks War Engine sized to me. |
Author: | zombocom [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:46 am ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
GW, SG and FW are all totally inconsistant in what they call Ork vehicles. The same name is sometimes used for three entirely different vehicles. |
Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:54 am ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
So that puts it as 2/3's of the size of the SG Ork WE? (Which we all know should have RA!) |
Author: | Legion 4 [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
Quote: (zombocom @ 04 Jun. 2009, 10:46 ) GW, SG and FW are all totally inconsistant in what they call Ork vehicles. The same name is sometimes used for three entirely different vehicles. I think inconsistency is a G/W-F/W-S/G standard ... not only in how they catagorize vehicles, but the well documented size variances is legendary ... ![]() ![]() |
Author: | daemonkin [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
Quote: (Legion 4 @ 04 Jun. 2009, 15:56 ) I think inconsistency is a G/W-F/W-S/G standard ... I thought I was the Irish one! Inconsistency is standard.. how oxymoronic is that? ![]() D. |
Author: | Legion 4 [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
But I'm Italian ! ![]() |
Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | FW Ork Battlewagons |
Quote: (daemonkin @ 04 Jun. 2009, 11:14 ) Quote: (Legion 4 @ 04 Jun. 2009, 15:56 ) I think inconsistency is a G/W-F/W-S/G standard ... I thought I was the Irish one! Inconsistency is standard.. how oxymoronic is that?  ![]() D. Hey, it's just another example of doublespeak. ![]() ![]() |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |