Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?

 Post subject: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:41 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:54 am
Posts: 596
Location: Sydney, Australia
Hi all,

Quick thing that's actually been bugging me for years: can anyone tell me why the player with the higher Strategy Rating has to place their units first when deploying, garrisoning or teleporting?

It makes no sense to me—they should at least deploy second, or better yet have the option of who deploys first.

Thoughts? :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:07 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:25 pm
Posts: 9525
Location: Worcester, MA
Higher SR places obectives/deploy/garrison first for balance reasons since they're very likely to get strategy and thus go first. This gives the opponent a slight handicap.

For teleporting, the higher strategy can choose to go first or defer.

_________________
Dave

Blog

NetEA Tournament Pack Website

Squats 2019-10-17


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:49 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 5569
They turn up first to the battlefield, it's part of being quick on the bounce :p

_________________
http://www.troublemakergames.co.uk/
Epic: Hive Development Thread


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:50 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:54 am
Posts: 596
Location: Sydney, Australia
Hi Dave. Thanks for responding. :)

Dave wrote:
Higher SR places obectives/deploy/garrison first for balance reasons since they're very likely to get strategy and thus go first. This gives the opponent a slight handicap.


Understood, but when Strategy 5 plays Strategy 4, for example, that "very likely" becomes "somewhat likely", in which case the punishment for being a higher Strategy Rating is even more severe—and makes even less sense. :)

This is the core of it: you've already paid for your Strategy Rating in your points costs, surely; why are you then punished further by always having to deploy first?

Dave wrote:
For teleporting, the higher strategy can choose to go first or defer.


That strikes me as a great house-rule, and one we'll probably adopt wholesale, but I can't see where the rules for Teleportation allow for that currently.

Happy to be enlightened, though, of course! :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:56 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
AFAIK Higher strategy rating has to place first when Teleporting too.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:57 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:25 pm
Posts: 9525
Location: Worcester, MA
I think that was cleared up recently, higher SR chooses, see under 1.4.1:

viewtopic.php?f=69&t=18419

_________________
Dave

Blog

NetEA Tournament Pack Website

Squats 2019-10-17


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:01 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Fair do's.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:18 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:54 am
Posts: 596
Location: Sydney, Australia
Are those clarifications in the Compendium these days?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:26 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:25 pm
Posts: 9525
Location: Worcester, MA
Unlikely, that was a relatively recent discussion and the last compendium was put together in 09. Between the compendium and that FAQ though you should have everything you need rules-wise.

_________________
Dave

Blog

NetEA Tournament Pack Website

Squats 2019-10-17


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:31 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:52 pm
Posts: 4262
With the higher strategy rating going first in objective placement and formation deployment you get the advantage of setting up the battlefield to your choosing to a certain degree.

You place the first objective which may influence you opponent, you place formations that your opponent may have to counter with his own. Forcing your opponent to react to you and not follow their plan is normally a good thing.

If you really don't like it then I'd suggest house ruling the defer mechanism for each step of deployment, but I don't think a wholesale change do the rules is warranted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Higher Strategy Rating going first: why?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:10 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:54 am
Posts: 596
Location: Sydney, Australia
Some good points there, guys. Thanks for responding. :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net