Tactical Command
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/

[NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=69&t=13202		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Chroma [ Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:31 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Just to keep the document thread managable, I'm creating this thread for discussion of the NetEA changes/ammendments.

Discuss!   :laugh:
Author:  Mephiston [ Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:48 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Looks OK to me. Any reason the 1 Commissar per 500pts didn't get through?
Author:  The_Real_Chris [ Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:08 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Neal said it was to cosmetic for the SG list.
Author:  Lord Inquisitor [ Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:20 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Quote: (Irondeath @ 30 Jul. 2008, 16:33 )

Is discussion to take place here?

If it is, I am moderately unhappy with the BL changes, points increases to the Feral and Oblits are not the way forward.

They won't be. These are a basic absolute bare-minimum changes needed to balance the lists as much as possible.

There will be a full BL review, and I will post a proper PDF document with all of the playtest changes.
Author:  nealhunt [ Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:38 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Just as a reminder/clarification, this is not an ideal set of revised army lists.  It's the "bare minimum" balance mods for a theoretical tourney environment - easy for a coordinator to include in the tourney rules, quick to digest and easy to adjust to.  A "bandaid" if you want to think of it that way.

Net EA will proceed with more comprehensive reviews separate from this.
Author:  Mephiston [ Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:42 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Ahh, thanks for the clarification Neal. Makes sense now.
Author:  redsimon [ Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:00 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Why is the single Warhound not more expensive in Steel Legion list, but only in Codex Astartes and White Scars list?
Author:  Evil and Chaos [ Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:08 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
I'm in favour of all of the changes.
Author:  The_Real_Chris [ Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:48 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Because 4 warhounds has never been a problem with the Steel Legion, for whatever reasons.
Author:  Chroma [ Fri Aug 01, 2008 12:21 am ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Quote: (redsimon @ 31 Jul. 2008, 21:00 )

Why is the single Warhound not more expensive in Steel Legion list, but only in Codex Astartes and White Scars list?

Because single Warhounds are just better for Marines than they are for Guard... their speed and ranged MW attacks make up for a weakness in the Marine army, while the IG have other toys to meet that need.
Author:  Dave [ Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:25 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Was it intentional to have the Attack Bike bumped up to 35cm for the White Scars but not for the Codex list?
Author:  Malakai [ Sat Nov 01, 2008 4:44 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Does the Eldar Heavy Weapon Platform take up two spaces or one space in a Wave Serpent?

-Malakai
Author:  Chroma [ Sat Nov 01, 2008 5:19 pm ]
Post subject:  [NetEA] NetEA Army Lists Ammendments Discussion
Quote: (Malakai @ 01 Nov. 2008, 15:44 )

Does the Eldar Heavy Weapon Platform take up two spaces or one space in a Wave Serpent?

-Malakai

Takes up one slot only; so a stand of Guardians and a Heavy Weapon Platform stand can fit in a Wave Serpent together.

This is to align with the 40k Eldar changes that force a Guardian squad to include a Weapon Platform and still fit in a Wave Serpent.
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/