People on my team are individuals who have typically helped out a lot on all two supplements (and the current productions) include but are not limited to:
Evil & Chaos, Chroma, Dave, Stugmeister, Juddski, Hena, and about fifty other people who I am 'dissing' right now.

And I like to refer to my teammates as 'targets' for my unspecified rage when things don't go exactly as I planned.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.

Twice I can understand, but why am I in there thrice? I'm not aware of Champing anything but Eldar now.

I think a round table approach would serve the project better. The ERC would have ~10 positions...

Chair
7 ACs
1 Rules Champ
1 TECS

When votes are required everyone on the ERC gets 1 vote (chair is tie-breaker).

When a position becomes vacant/neglected, people put themselves forward and an ERC vote is made.

Simple, eh?

_________________
Uti possidetis, ita possideatis.
May your beer be laid under an enchantment of surpassing excellence for seven years!
An online epic force creator: Armyforge

first is the name of the team
then the second line is the people the team consists of; (ie: yourself in both capacities, and the rest of the xenos ACs)
perhaps i should have put "Chroma's 'Team'" instead, but i dislike that particular form of grammar-abuse

_________________
~Every Tool Is A Weapon, If You Hold It Right~

(sigh) I had suggested the Quorum of Army Champs and the vast majority of people tossed the idea. I won't bother to go digging for the threads but the majority of posts called for the status quo (selection vs election, small-ish ERC vs. large one). Now that we have what most people asked for, we still have players complaining.

People, there is no solution that will make all of us happy. That is the reality and no amount of posting will make the ERC selection process fair in the eyes of the public.

Instead of focusing on the alleged ills of the past, can I ask for some ideas on how to move forward. What do you see being the most fair way to replace an Army Champ? A list developer? A NetERC member? What do you think needs to be done by said individuals? What are valid reasons to have people removed? After January 1, I promise I will compile all of the ideas that are PM'd to me, post them, and then present them to the NetERC. I will then regularly hound them until they either kick me out or come up with some structure so that we don't have to worry about rehashing all of this again.

Does that work well enough?

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.

Just to be clear. I'm not complaining, just a proposal to consider for any future re-org...

It won't matter anyway as half the people will have changed their minds


"Ever since I called for the rescue of that Simpson lad, I have taken a lot of heat. So I am flip-flopping. I say, let him stay down there."