Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 260 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 18  Next

NetEA Army List Compendium 2012

 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:35 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 5569
Signal: The Warhound thing has always been an FAQ rather than in their rules.

_________________
http://www.troublemakergames.co.uk/
Epic: Hive Development Thread


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:37 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: Wheaton, IL
A portrait only layout would more or less require two page spreads instead of the one page landscapes, possibly bringing the document to 250-275 pages. It's simply not possible to format the statlines (through organization or font size) in a legible manner. It also follows suite with GW publications and Raiders, but not Siege. Seige appears to have it's reference sheets in 6pt font or less, which is too small for easy reading.

Zombo - that's incorrect. See p46 of the current online rulebook (section 5), or p103 of the original GW hardcopy. With an apparently soon to be updated FAQ, though, it's a moot point.

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.


Last edited by Spectrar Ghost on Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:41 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 5569
More fool me I guess :)

_________________
http://www.troublemakergames.co.uk/
Epic: Hive Development Thread


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:51 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 5483
Location: London, UK
Echoing the others, well done for getting it into print; a real Xmas present.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:01 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 5569
If standardised short forms were used for Armour, (Base Contact), Small Arms and Assault Weapons, you can squeeze a ref sheet onto a portrait page in a decent font size, for example:

Attachment:
reftest.pdf [48.57 KiB]
Downloaded 255 times


However, it's a lot of work and not worth it as it'll delay the final version by quite a while. A job for next year I think.

_________________
http://www.troublemakergames.co.uk/
Epic: Hive Development Thread


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:40 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 1927
Location: Australia
Hey Guys,

Looking at the Space Wolves, the 0-1 Wolf Lord, does not appear as an upgrade for the Great Company.

Alpha Legion page 115, no number of bikes in the bike company.

Cheers
Aaron


Last edited by CAL001 on Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:46 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:39 am
Posts: 1097
Location: Alleroed, Denmark
Great work; thanks, Dobbsy!

Shouldn't the document have a copyright statement somewhere? Preferably a Creative Commons style license so we can all copy & distribute it...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:50 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 4:17 am
Posts: 720
Location: Agri-World-NZ77
...


Last edited by adam77 on Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:06 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Spectrar Ghost wrote:
Eldar

p156, 159, 162, 165, 168, 171, 174, 180
Firestorm has no transport capacity

p156, 159, 162, 165, 168, 171, 174
Night spinner has no transport capacity


These are not errors, as Firestorms and Night Spinners have been shown to have Falcon-level transport ability in subsequent GW texts; no army currently makes use of said transport ability yet.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:20 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
SpeakerToMachines wrote:
Great work; thanks, Dobbsy!

Shouldn't the document have a copyright statement somewhere? Preferably a Creative Commons style license so we can all copy & distribute it...


Per IP guidelines from GW, anything fan made needs to be public domain. We can't copyright something that is derivative IP anyway.

It should contain the standard disclaimer showing no copyright infringement intended that you can find in Raiders and Siege, however. You can tack that on at the beginning or end. E&C and I put it in both.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:25 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:30 am
Posts: 1486
Location: Örebro, Sweden
page 193: The Tau Barracuda fighters ion cannon should have an AA 5+ attack. :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:46 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 5682
Location: Australia
Will review when i get the time, however just wanted to say thanks to Dobbsy. Great work.

_________________
Frogbear is responsible for...
Previous World Eaters
Previous Emperor's Children
Previous Death Guard
Previous Imperial Fists
Previous Chaos Squats


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:00 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: Wheaton, IL
Chroma wrote:
Spectrar Ghost wrote:
Eldar

p156, 159, 162, 165, 168, 171, 174, 180
Firestorm has no transport capacity

p156, 159, 162, 165, 168, 171, 174
Night spinner has no transport capacity


These are not errors, as Firestorms and Night Spinners have been shown to have Falcon-level transport ability in subsequent GW texts; no army currently makes use of said transport ability yet.


I'd forgotten that conversation...

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:45 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:15 am
Posts: 1832
Location: Oslo, Norway
The 2010 draft had everything in portrait. They work very well on my Kindle, at least. Next year, maybe.

But more importantly: Great job, dobbsy!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DRAFT NetEA Army Compendium 2012 DRAFT
PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:16 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 6:12 am
Posts: 1331
Location: Australia
hurrah for dobbsy

just looked though my bloody hand list, following errors have been noticed:


in the lists:

the upgrade costs for the arch heretic (warlord/master thaumaturge, and STeG4s) and mechanised warband (STeG4s) formations are absent (should be 50pts, 75pts, and 25pts respectively)
you've also added 25 points to both the harbinger bomber and hell-talons, which should be 400 and 225 respectively

in the stats:
the master thaumaturge's weapon should be called Greater Arcane Powers (to differentiate it from the regular kind, who only get 1 extra attack)
i'd also prefer if the warlords statline was moved upwards to be under the master thaumaturge (keeps the three supcom options next to each other)
n20s can ditch the ability to transport the warlord (since there isnt that option available to them) or increase it to also include magisters, death brigades, and master thaumaturges)
n20s should also have their weapon split into two profiles (its an ap4+IC shot at 15cms, and a small arms IC shot)

also, can we pleeease change the name "Albork Orkstein" back to Orkamedies. Albork Orkstein is a terrible name (even aside from the double orking)

and again, thanks for all the hard work dobbsy

_________________
~Every Tool Is A Weapon, If You Hold It Right~


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 260 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 18  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net