Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Crazy Idea

 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:41 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand

(Hena @ Jul. 23 2007,12:34)
QUOTE
I wouldn't lower the cost of Destructors any more than that 275.

Really?  :O  Do you actually like these - why? I fail to see the attraction  ???  :)

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:46 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand

(Evil and Chaos @ Jul. 23 2007,12:36)
QUOTE
This has been raised before (perhaps by you E&C?)


I've supported a 'free' upgrade for Tornados before.

Today, I'm looking at the other Land Speeders:

- Multi-Melta Speeders - Too cheap (And a crutch?) or just right?

- Typhoons - Too expensive?

Oh so you are...

IMO - no, MM speeders are 'just right'.

Tornadoes - yeah make em free upgrade.

Typhoons - no +25 is reasonable considering what you can do with them.

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:00 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
In the Scions list


Unless you're going to propose that some elements of the Scions of Iron list be adopted into the core list, discussing how the price of units is balanced in the Scions list is not useful.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:10 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
No but it does make the point about cost / power.


No, it really isn't useful.

A Predator Destructor may well be costed correctly at 75pts when used as an upgrade... but it obviously isn't worth that when used independently in a squadron of four.

You're comparing apples with oranges.


And I don't think that the main list should have overly cheap things in it.

Neither do I?  ???





_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:23 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand

(Hena @ Jul. 23 2007,13:05)
QUOTE
I don't think that the main list should have overly cheap things in it.

But that is the whole point - and tell me how 250 is too cheap? I mean lets face it, they really are not an attractive unit right now. Even you admitted that you don't like them.  

Interestingly the 40k points ratio would have them at about 200-225 points if the annihilators were 275.  Means nothing in Epic of course, but I do think that in Epic Destructors are less attractive than Annihilators.

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:53 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I'm with Markconz on this one, Destructors should be cheaper, in the core list.

Fix formations at 3 set types*, if we have to.


(4 Destructors, 4 Annihilators, or 2 of each, with different costs for each formation type)





_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:44 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Beavercreek, Ohio, USA
I said it the last time we talked about this: The Tornados should be a free upgrade for the basic Land Speeder.

_________________
I shot a Deathstrike Missile and destroyed an enemy titan in my pajamas last night. ?How it got into my pajamas I still don't know...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:43 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
I like the fact that a couple years ago I was hammering the point on the boards that Speeders were a darn good choice and a perfectly valid source of MW attacks in the SM list because many people thought they were weak, but now E&C raises the idea that maybe they are too good...

I could also agree to a 0-point change for Tornadoes.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:53 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I've no idea how they could be seen as a weak choice! :D

I never leave the fortress monastry without at least one squadron!

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:35 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
Land Speeders are superb. My regular opponent always fields at least 2 formations of them. I really hate it when he moves 6cm close to my formations, unloads his Multi-meltas and in my next activation forces me to move or engange.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Crazy Idea
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:59 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA

(Evil and Chaos @ Jul. 23 2007,18:53)
QUOTE
I've no idea how they could be seen as a weak choice! :D

I never leave the fortress monastry without at least one squadron!

I agree completely, yet I was at pains to convince anyone.

IIRC, this was at the confluence of the "LVs suck!  Mixed formations suck!  Taking them is virtual suicide!" movement and the "Marines can't beat WEs!  They must have MW/TK attacks!" movement.  You'd think that would cancel out for the Speeders, but the LV voices were undoubtedly louder and more insistent.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net