Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 5
  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Jervis talks, we listen
Dwarf Supreme
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:50 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA

(Moscovian @ Jul. 02 2007,11:38)
QUOTE
It is time... For Net EA.

It certainly looks like it.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
orangesm
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:59 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 482
Location: Greater Los Angeles Area, CA
E&C - what do you know?

I think it has been Net EA for a long time - just that we have tried to get Specialist Games to approve what we have worked on.

I think if we go the route of NetEA we should try to just not produce as many army list as possible, but actually produce Swordwind like supplements and crack open the E:A rulebook pdf to update/edit it when a rules review determines updates are needed.

_________________
Airspace - AeroImp Forum
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:07 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
E&C - what do you know?


I had a short chat with Jervis 7 weeks ago on the topic of the SG department in general.

His opinion was that Epic would be best-served by setting up a miniature company (No pun intended!) specifically to sell and promote Epic. So if it ever happens, that'll most likely be how it goes.

He also mentioned another possibility was allowing FW to take over more of the rules development for Epic (I pulled a face but didn't say anything heh).

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Magnus
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:08 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:30 pm
Posts: 462

(primarch @ Jul. 02 2007,04:48)
QUOTE
Hi!

Its a pipe dream. Given GW's recent lest than stellar sales record, I doubt we'll ever see another "swing at the plate".

Unless there is a major change in management (which I don't foresee), don't expect anything beyond their usual core games.

Primarch

All hail the chronie warmaster!!

We follow you, oh august leader, to victory and beyond!!!  :p
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Dwarf Supreme
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:08 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA
I'm not sure I want FW to develop rules for Epic.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:13 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire

(Dwarf Supreme @ Jul. 02 2007,17:08)
QUOTE
I'm not sure I want FW to develop rules for Epic.

Considering that until I told him, FW's chief rules writer wasn't aware how Epic's turn sequence works these days (Despite having written a couple of scenarios for Epic in IA:3)... no, I don't think it's a good idea. :)

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
BlackLegion
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:21 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
So long as Epic products are available in the online store there is no need for NetEA.

And i really don't want that FW developes rules for epic. FW can produce the models but WE are here to develope the rules :D

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
CyberShadow
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:47 pm 
Swarm Tyrant
Swarm Tyrant
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm
Posts: 9350
Location: Singapore

(Moscovian @ Jul. 02 2007,16:38)
QUOTE
It is time... For Net EA.

Pleaase see this thread.

_________________
https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond.
https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Lord Inquisitor
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:15 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Norfolk VA USA
Hmm. I don't really see that NetEA is the way to go unless necessary.

Right now, new gamers still have access to the SG site - which has a wealth of quality material available for free, however rarely that is updated, including the latest versions which we are working on.

The instant we take development away from the SG site, it becomes all but invisible to new players. I'm coercing a couple of friends towards Epic right now - and where else are they getting their info from but SG?

While the SG website is still there, it is worth exploiting. Even if it is NetEA in all but name, as long as the updates we send in are still being posted, what's the problem? Free bandwith, if nothing else!

SG may be on life-support. We're doing all the development as it is. Might as well be NetEA. But while the SG website exists, commencing NetEA is only going to fragment the community, which really might kill the game.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Markconz
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:51 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
I agree with Lord Inquisitor.  

It already is NetEA.  Currently SG provides a forum for development, hosts all documentation (even if players develop much of it), sells the figures, and  'advertises' the product by having a well organised section on GW website.

No need to change this plan, and doing so would be counterproductive at this stage IMO.

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Moscovian
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:53 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
LI / Mark,

I'm not so sure that it would fragment the community.  The goals of a NetEA community would have a lot of overlap with the SG community.  What I am talking about is a contingency plan.

If SG fails then there is a structure already in place to take control.

If SG bounces back in any capacity, many of the efforts put forth in NetEA can be shared with SG.

If SG continues as is and we do nothing, the community will die (this is how the world ends, not with a bang, but with a whimper).  Sorry - I couldn't help but throw that in there. :;):

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Dwarf Supreme
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:15 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA

(Moscovian @ Jul. 03 2007,09:53)
QUOTE
What I am talking about is a contingency plan.

That's what I was thinking as well. Get the ball rolling in case GW pulls the plug with no warning.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
orangesm
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:46 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 482
Location: Greater Los Angeles Area, CA
I think figuring out where to concentrate and focus our efforts is important.  

Right now this very forum has 3 Supplements being created.
Raiders - Dark Eldar, Necrons, & Minervan Armored Regiment (which I think has its own staff and time table)
Black Crusade - Black Legion, Chaos Cult, & Cadian (mostly Chorma on his own getting feedback from community)
Krieg supplement - Krieg Siegebreakers & unknown (mostly E&C on his own getting feedback from community)

It would make sense for the community to try and focus on the same projects and try and help each other.  For example if the community focused on producing Black Crusade for a few months, I think an excellent product could be produced.  

Right now we are in the middle of a rules review and it seems that the only list that is official that is not getting attention is Orks - both Space Marines and Steel Legion are getting attention in the form of questioning the current rules for a lot of units and how to include newer models.  Are there parts of list that need to be looked at - yes.  But I think the majority of these list are fine as is.  It seems like the entire Steel Legion list is getting voted on right now.

How do we balance all the developing list if we are trying to re-balance half of the official list at the same time?

So we as the Epic community need to focus our efforts and find a common direction.  Setting up the NetE:A infrastructure in support of Specialist Games may be able to do just that.




_________________
Airspace - AeroImp Forum
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: Jervis talks, we listen
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada

(orangesm @ Jul. 03 2007,15:46)
QUOTE
Black Crusade - Black Legion, Chaos Cult, & Cadian (mostly Chorma on his own getting feedback from community)

I'm hoping to get Ulthwe in there as well.  I've had some pictures submitted as well, but I still don't have stuff for all the units.

On the back burner, I've got some ideas for a Tyranid sourcebook as well, Catachans and, the obvious, Iyanden, but I'm not sure what else could go in there... would be nice to see more variant Marine lists showing up.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 5
  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net