http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/machvhb.htm
Personally, I'd have done an Inferno gun variant.
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| New Macharius variant. http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=10508 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/machvhb.htm Personally, I'd have done an Inferno gun variant.
|
|
| Author: | Otterman [ Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
Well, that should keep Redram busy. And: Damnit! I wanted to be the first to plug titan weapons onto superheavies. Crap. |
|
| Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
Damnit! I wanted to be the first to plug titan weapons onto superheavies. *Looks at Stormblade and Shadowsword*
|
|
| Author: | Otterman [ Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
(Evil and Chaos @ Sep. 10 2007,12:19) QUOTE *Looks at Stormblade and Shadowsword* Smarty pants. 
|
|
| Author: | vanvlak [ Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
Nice tank -and twin-linked mega bolter sounds nasty; but aren't they far too small to be Titan weapons? Compare them to - uhm - the tanker's head? |
|
| Author: | Reaver [ Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
I like the look of this - give me a few hours... Regards, Reaver |
|
| Author: | Warmaster Nice [ Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
(vanvlak @ Sep. 10 2007,19:32) QUOTE Nice tank -and twin-linked mega bolter sounds nasty; but aren't they far too small to be Titan weapons? Compare them to - uhm - the tanker's head? The Warhound Vulcan is actually twin linked so if you removed the gun casing and much of the ammunition and aiming equipment from the titan weapon I suppose it's about the right size. One thing that always bothered be a bit though, is that the Epic version of the FW warhound had a different style Vulcan than then 40k scale. The Epic version looks more like a pair of Boltguns glued together... Nice model although I sometimes question werther it is really necessary to mount every single weapon type in 40k on every single tank chassis type... |
|
| Author: | Otterman [ Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
(Warmaster Nice @ Sep. 10 2007,12:49) QUOTE Nice model although I sometimes question werther it is really necessary to mount every single weapon type in 40k on every single tank chassis type... Och! Heresy! I wish I was at home so I could measure the Warhound plasma gun vs. the Stormblade plasma gun. Their stats are the same (2xMW2+, slow) but I have a visceral memory of the stormblade cannon being larger... |
|
| Author: | Otterman [ Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
Answering own question: The Stormblade weapon is approximately 20 mm long, 8 mm wide, 3 mm thick. Total volume 480 cubic mm. Warhound, approximately 25 mm long, 6 mm wide, 4 mm thick. Total volume 600 cubic mm. So, memory is fleeting... |
|
| Author: | Legion 4 [ Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
Looks like Reaver ... gots another mission !
|
|
| Author: | Lord Inquisitor [ Tue Sep 11, 2007 3:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | New Macharius variant. |
I've a couple of spare warhound weapon systems (long story) and I was planning on getting a couple of baneblades and mounting a plasma blastgun and a VMB on them. I guess it's got a name now... |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|