Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Walkers as Tanks

 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:12 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm
Posts: 10956
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
One of the main images in a lot of SciFi is the large walking "Tank". Battletech, CAV, Heavy Gear, Epic, and War Machine come to mind in the game world.

So, is there a role for the walker on the battlefield?

Can it be the Tank?

Maybe just a Recon?

Going more with the Heavy Gear sized ones, maybe the upper end Troops (Terminators on Steroids)?

Thoughts, feelings, opinions, disgust. Share...


dafrca

_________________
"Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness"
              - Cities of Death, page 59

Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:20 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
Yes there are definite roles for walkers - why do armies use vulnerable tank tracks at present? Because they need all-terrain capability and tank tracks are the best way to do it so far. Once fluid and speedy bipedal robotics are worked out (not long now) they will be much more efficient. The neurology of bipedal walking is actually very complicated with heaps of feedback loops and the like, but those in the field are getting very close to achieving some remarkable results.

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:39 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm
Posts: 10956
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
Do you think it will be "Walkers" like Heavy Gear or Robots with much lower profiles?

Is the "Tall Target" issue really and issue?

dafrca

_________________
"Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness"
              - Cities of Death, page 59

Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:52 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
Quote (dafrca @ 17 2005 June,01:39)
Do you think it will be "Walkers" like Heavy Gear or Robots with much lower profiles?

Is the "Tall Target" issue really and issue?

dafrca

I think that a permanently tall profile is a very bad idea on the modern battlefield - though the capacity for it could be useful - much easier to do with legs than tank tracks too. Being able to morph your profile is much for useful than always having the same profile - just as modern soldiers crawl, crouch or stand to make best use of available cover.

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:12 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36949
Location: Ohio - USA
Light AFVs, used in Traditional role of CAV - screening, pursuit and recon ...

_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:20 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
Quote (Legion 4 @ 17 2005 June,05:12)
Light AFVs, used in Traditional role of CAV - screening, pursuit and recon ...

But if economically and technologically it is possible to achieve efficient artificial bipedal locomotion - why not have heavy AFV's as well?

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:29 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm
Posts: 10956
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
Quote (Legion 4 @ 16 2005 June,21:12)
Light AFVs, used in Traditional role of CAV - screening, pursuit and recon ...

Sort of the role Armored Cars sometimes played.

Interesting.

dafrca

_________________
"Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness"
              - Cities of Death, page 59

Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:35 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm
Posts: 10956
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
Quote (Markconz @ 16 2005 June,23:20)
But if economically and technologically it is possible to achieve efficient artificial bipedal locomotion - why not have heavy AFV's as well?

To play devils advocate...

1) Ground Pressure. The same amount of armor on a tank and on a two legged biped. The tank will sink less as it spreads out the weight.

2) Cost. The tank will require less to make it work at the same tech level.

3) Maintenance. The complex system to make the robot work may cause it to be a maintenance issue. Sort of like the Fighter Airplane of today. Useful, but expensive to make and maintain.

Now I am not saying these "have" to be. Just offering some thoughts as to why it might not become the heavy armor.

dafrca

_________________
"Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness"
              - Cities of Death, page 59

Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:52 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
Quote (dafrca @ 17 2005 June,07:35)
Quote (Markconz @ 16 2005 June,23:20)
But if economically and technologically it is possible to achieve efficient artificial bipedal locomotion - why not have heavy AFV's as well?

To play devils advocate...

1) Ground Pressure. The same amount of armor on a tank and on a two legged biped. The tank will sink less as it spreads out the weight.

2) Cost. The tank will require less to make it work at the same tech level.

3) Maintenance. The complex system to make the robot work may cause it to be a maintenance issue. Sort of like the Fighter Airplane of today. Useful, but expensive to make and maintain.

Now I am not saying these "have" to be. Just offering some thoughts as to why it might not become the heavy armor.

dafrca

1: We shall make them with huge feet  :p
2: We shall close more orphanages :D
3: Maybe so - though tank tracks are also a huge pain to maintain from what I understand, especially in the desert.

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:12 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm
Posts: 10956
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
Quote (Markconz @ 16 2005 June,23:52)
Quote (dafrca @ 17 2005 June,07:35)
Quote (Markconz @ 16 2005 June,23:20)
But if economically and technologically it is possible to achieve efficient artificial bipedal locomotion - why not have heavy AFV's as well?

To play devils advocate...

1) Ground Pressure. The same amount of armor on a tank and on a two legged biped. The tank will sink less as it spreads out the weight.

1: We shall make them with huge feet ?:p

And on that note I will conceed.  :p

I just know tonight I am going to have nightmares of Reavers with feet ten times larger stomping around my head.

dafrca

(taking his big feet to bed!)  :laugh:

_________________
"Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness"
              - Cities of Death, page 59

Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:18 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 7:35 am
Posts: 5455
Location: Finland
1) They will have to be faster and more durable than humans and able to go oto places a human can go. And preferably to a few places a human _can't_ go. Otherwise you'll just send in poor grunts or regular scout vehicles and get the job done with less expensive tools.

2) Building on 1) I think we'll first see some kind of powered armor followed by some kind of support platform for infantry operating in dense terrain.

And one more problem about walkers: recovery. You can tow a tank with a broken track/transmission but you need a separate trailer assembly for a walker with a broken leg. And if it just happens to be in terrain normal vehicles can't go...  :;):

_________________
I don't know and I let who care. -J.S.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:05 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:52 am
Posts: 10348
Location: Malta
Mojarn, do you realise you've started to describe the Tau? Are they really the most reasonable future army? :D

_________________
Back from oblivion (again)?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:34 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 7:35 am
Posts: 5455
Location: Finland
Quote (vanvlak @ 17 2005 June,10:05)
Mojarn, do you realise you've started to describe the Tau? Are they really the most reasonable future army? :D

Space Marines, actually:
Powered armor = powered armor
Support platform = Dreadnought.  :;):

_________________
I don't know and I let who care. -J.S.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:11 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
Quote (Mojarn Piett @ 17 2005 June,09:18)
1) They will have to be faster and more durable than humans and able to go oto places a human can go. And preferably to a few places a human _can't_ go. Otherwise you'll just send in poor grunts or regular scout vehicles and get the job done with less expensive tools.

2) Building on 1) I think we'll first see some kind of powered armor followed by some kind of support platform for infantry operating in dense terrain.

And one more problem about walkers: recovery. You can tow a tank with a broken track/transmission but you need a separate trailer assembly for a walker with a broken leg. And if it just happens to be in terrain normal vehicles can't go... ?:;):

Regarding the 'less expensive tools' option and we'll just send some 'cheap grunts'.
The political decison to go ahead with the gulf war depended almost entirely on estimated casualty figures - monetary cost was not the issue, human lives and the political cost that would entail was. (According to a recent book I skim-read anyway!). Hence heaps of money is being spent on military AI and tech. Pilotless drones have been used for a while and some primitive combat robots (tracked) have recently been introduced.  I imagine their capabilites will gradually expand.

Going out on a limb, I think remote control walker combat droids will happen before power armour - easier to build them smaller and more agile than power armour (which would be a huge target for any man and his dog with an RPG in its early stages I think). Robots are also utterly expendable in dangerous urban warfare - which is the sort of thing the current tracked robots are for (the army has been requesting them for some time I think).

Actually here is a interesting page I just found - haven't read it, just looked at the pics ;) - check out the 'soldier robot' section with the little spider droid thing.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... nd/fcs.htm

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Walkers as Tanks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:19 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:43 pm
Posts: 7258
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Well... the development of walkers as AFVs is really dependent on what government is in vogue at the time.

I too like democracies, but a democracy might not be the best form of government for a combatant.

The former USSR was willing to sacrifice its' troops and I still think that...

A government willing to sacrifice troops can field more poor bloody mudsuckers than robots could be fielded.

Maybe that will change, but I don't see it happening in the next twenty years or so...

I see AT weapons for infantry developing faster than viable walkers...

Shalom,
Maksim-Smelchak.

_________________
6mm Sci-fi:
http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/6mm ... nWarGames/
My Personal Blog:
http://6mm-minis.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net