Ginger wrote:
Note, the use of the many and various
army lists is a completely different thing! Apart from the core lists, these have all been created (and thus 'owned') by us!
nope. 100% derivative work. we don't own anything. technically they're in the green if they told us to take it down. It's not worth it to do it and too easy to be cheeky and do things like call the Rhino a Unicornis and they can't do squat (har har) about it.
Ginger wrote:
Fascinating to watch the growth and hyperbole in this thread

totes

Stormwind wrote:
I imagine that if this did come it would only appear in stores if it had a boxed game like Space Hulk / Dreadfleet / Calth but after the splash it would be direct only.
and that's an IF. If you step back and look at what is going on there's a logic path to follow. The BaC is a hybrid board game with minis fully usable in 30/40k if so inclined and absolutely target the same type of market that things like Deadzone, AvP, and formerly, Dust, did/do. How effective this is of course will be open for debate and time will tell (the general look to things has been somewhat positive on the set and sales appear to be very good). I suspect attempting to counter x-wing/armada/halo/FSA will occur with some forms of mining AI and BFG for something new and boxed set9s) produced I suspect (or at least are having a strong look at them). I could be wrong but epic in some form seems far off and in all likelihood would actually be not what we expect or know now.
Largo_W wrote:
Brace yourself! Lawsuits are coming. This is also a legit way for them to pursue all the people in the grey market.
This may be pretty bad for the game alltogether. Overall I am not that overjoyed...
Not really. Anything infringing would be/could be C&D'd already so this has little bearing on that whatsoever. They're just as able to lawyer up on anyone hypothetically making debiggerized items regardless of any "new from the dead" Specialist Games. Now that being said, they
may chose to pay closer attention but they've already lost big on the CHS debacle so are likely to be more gun-shy. That does mean though that 3rd parties should be clear about where they're pulling inspiration from and not use TM names and we as a community need to be careful about not referring to things as "XYZ's Tau/DE/AdMech" because frankly they're not and it's irresponsible for us to use those terms.
epic wrote:
Also plastics would nowdays be easy for GW given they use lots of factorys in China.
If I was a conspiracy theorist I would say you never know someone may of had a hand in making sure the tmg
line did not get made at the factory

very small chance but you never know !
Actually GW plastics are done in house and also, ironaically their factory set up is well photographed and documented in industry trade mags (the injection plastics industry, not wargaming) and easy to pull up using search engines. They
did attempt way back to outsource but combinations of quality control and IP theft caused them to invest heavily on their internal capacity (actually this capacity is the #1 value of the GW plc, not their IP). Now FW on the other hand DOES have a strong presence in China for some parts of the line(s) due to the use of resin and some of the time consuming techniques (such as grav fed resin) that are used for big stuff (as I understand it) like titans. Probably the reason you can get China forge items that are better than the FW stuff

epic wrote:
yes this has been coming up a lot on the recent news and a lot of people are saying they could be doing this just to keep the hands on the IP given that they no longer make or have shown no intrest in specialist games.
That's not how copyright works in the US/UK/EU whatsoever. They don't lose any IP nor copyright (well not for life + 70 years). This has NOTHING to do with maintaining a copyright.
_________________
He's a lawyer and a super-villian. That's like having a shark with a bazooka!
-
I HAVE NO POINT-
Penal Legion-Fan list-
Help me make Whitescars not suck!