*looks around* I see no mention of people wanting it to be like the epic board - I didn't particularly like the epic board layout, but I understand why it was the way it was - just like I don't particularly like the layout of the new SG forum, but I understand why it is that way.
I do, however, expect it to be run with some small measure of consistency, and not like a series of warring nation states, each forum having its own obscure set of rules and being run by a different set of people. At the moment it's being run more like a poorly-conceived GW fan site than a professional forum. Admittedly, after the cooling-off period (Now that they've bothered to tell people about it, rather than leaving it as an unwritten rule) things *might* get better, but by the time that comes around the regular posters will probably have been leached off by other sites. Besides, listening to customers hasn't been GW's strong point, so just *what* suggestions they decide to take on board is pretty much a lucky dip. As PG has said, the forum is designed to allow SG to have access to a free, readily-available playtest group for they rules, it's not a community forum, and it's not for fans of the games, it's for those who want to help SG do their job. Same with the competitions - SG needs articles, so what better way to get them than to give away a load of SG stock in exchange for a ton of entries that you can then use to prolong the shelf-life of their games. Welcome to the battery farm, people, hope you don't mind confined spaces.
How's THAT for venting? and yes, I do have a limitless depth of cynicism to draw from.
|