pretty much any/all of the older khorne daemon engines are perfect for the role, I'm fairly sure that's what was envisaged when the unit type was created for E:A
pic ref:
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Differentiating Assault Engines & Support Engines http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=30637 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Stormwind [ Sun Dec 13, 2015 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Differentiating Assault Engines & Support Engines |
What kind of models to people use for Demon Engines when there are already things like Defilers as separate entries in a list? I was thinking that Support Engines could easily be repurposed Basilisk models, but Assault ones I wasn't sure about. |
|
| Author: | kyussinchains [ Sun Dec 13, 2015 8:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Differentiating Assault Engines & Support Engines |
pretty much any/all of the older khorne daemon engines are perfect for the role, I'm fairly sure that's what was envisaged when the unit type was created for E:A pic ref:
|
|
| Author: | Apocolocyntosis [ Sun Dec 13, 2015 8:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Differentiating Assault Engines & Support Engines |
Yeah i think it is just a catch all term for the old demon engines to avoid having to stat them all separately (EA being abstracted, etc.) Doomblasters, cannons of khorne, and blood reapers for support. Rest for assault. |
|
| Author: | Stormwind [ Sun Dec 13, 2015 10:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Differentiating Assault Engines & Support Engines |
Damn those models are brutal |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|