Ginger wrote:
I did try to say there was no real *strategic*
Note, the example given was only Guardians + WG.
With WL, I agree the situation will favour the Eldar under either option - but this still ends up with a Broken and damaged Reaver occupying the objective. After that, we both agree that the Eldar definitely has possible options against the Reaver providing they have the right tools and decide it is worth it - both decisions that are made before the 1st turn happens. Hence the initial observation.
Ah yeah, I was just using the OP's real example.
Quote:
Do you have any firm views either way on whether 'Gates may be blocked or not, and if not, how the Eldar formation may exit the webway?
I wouldn't say "firm", but I do think physically blocking it is a bit beardy since it is purely a construct of an omission in the rules and otherwise fails the "what one would expect" test IMO. In the specific example of a war engine it seems more acceptable, but remember that the same thing can be achieved with a single stand of grotz.
Personally if it were up to me, I would treat it as a standard case of entering ZoC - that is, you have to BtB until the unit loses its ZoC. But in general I tend to go with whatever my opponent feels is the most realistic thing.