Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=24232 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | LordotMilk [ Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
Can the bikeboyz gain cover from the Meka-Dragster? |
Author: | LordotMilk [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
Anyone? |
Author: | kyussinchains [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
my interpretation is that they can gain the cover bonus, the -1 to hit is not from terrain (vehicles don't count as terrain) so mounted troops behave as infantry in this situation and could benefit from the -1 to hit against them |
Author: | carlos [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
warbikes are INF and the speedsta is AV, so if they touch the AV they get the -1 when shot at. I believe the general convention is that an AV may provide cover to 2 inf units (like b2b maximum when assaulting) or 2 units per DC - couldn't find it in the FAQ but remember it from somewhere. |
Author: | Andrew_NZ [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 6:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
But the special units "mounted" characteristic rule is pretty clear. "Mounted units count as vehicles for terrain effects, . . . " And the -1 to hit modifier for being beside an armoured vehicle is in the 1.8.4 Terrain Effects special rule section. So the mounted stand counts as a vehicle for this modifier under the terrain effect rule? I'd guess that the bikes/horses/mounts are all too big to allow the vehicle to provide enough cover. The rules don't let you take the mounted troops into a building or let them swim across a river. |
Author: | kyussinchains [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
The rule simply states that infantry in base contact with an armoured vehicle recieve a -1 cover bonus, rather than the vehicle counting as terrain though.....I'm quite surprised this hasn't come up before in a FAQ |
Author: | Onyx [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
The Warbikes (and any Mounted unit for that fact) would gain a -1 to hit modifier (but no cover save) if in base contact with a vehicle (whether friendly or enemy). It helps to quote the whole sentence from the Mounted rule: Quote: Mounted units count as vehicles for terrain effects, and as infantry units for all other purposes. There is no FAQ needed for this. Mounted simply makes changes to the way a unit moves. Mounted units cannot enter buildings, jungles, rivers etc as mentioned. They also make Dangerous Terrain tests when entering certain terrain types ( ruins, woods etc). That's really all there is to it. For all other purposes they are considered infantry. Infantry gain a -1 to hit modifier for being in contact with an armoured vehicle. Mounted units gain the same bonus. Being in cover is not directly related to being in terrain. I hope I've explained it clearly enough... ![]() Just to help clarify my first comment a bit more: Quote: Q:Can an infantry unit claim cover from enemy armored vehicles?
A:Yes. The rule as written does not distinguish between friendly and enemy vehicles for cover benefits. Some groups feel this is an odd situation and house rule that the cover from enemy units is not allowed, so feel free to cover this in the 5-minute warm-up with your opponent. |
Author: | Andrew_NZ [ Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
Well, I think it is rather less certain. The -1 to hit is a cover bonus, and hence a terrain effect. Anyway, this question has appeared twice before and been answered equally positively in the other direction. Earlier this year where I remember reading it and being surprised. http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=22675&hilit=mounted+infantry+vehicle And from a previous discussion in 2010. http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=95&t=18723&p=361795&hilit=mounted+infantry+vehicle#p361795 Personally I'd love to be able to nestle my Shining Spears up to their companion Wave Serpents for a bit of extra protection. But I'd say such definite, but opposite, answers to the question does deserve a FAQ; Under "Mounted" in the specialist units special ability section. |
Author: | kyussinchains [ Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
I agree with Onyx, as written, the -1 bonus for cover, while in the terrain section, is not from terrain, it's a re-use of an existing rule for convenience sake But if Nealhunt has spoken, as rules dude for the ERC he tends to carry the most clout...... |
Author: | Onyx [ Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
Well seeing as I'm a member of the FAQ rules subcommittee, I'll make sure we have this discussion when Neal gets some free time from real life issues so we can clear it up. It seems as though it's being played in different ways around the world (as are quite a few important rules). It's amazing how we can read the same rules and come to different conclusions ![]() |
Author: | carlos [ Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
I've had my shining spears hug my wave serpents before. Makes sense to me. |
Author: | Ginger [ Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
- - - and AFAIK since at least 2009, E-UK have played that "mounted" troops count as vehicles for these purposes and hence do not get the 'Infantry' cover bonus, as per Neal's earlier pronouncements. (But I agree that WS mounted Guardians flanked by 2x jetbike formations are really cool, even without the additional 'cover'). An FAQ is definitely needed. Onyx wrote: It seems as though it's being played in different ways around the world (as are quite a few important rules). I couldn't agree more.
It's amazing how we can read the same rules and come to different conclusions ![]() |
Author: | nealhunt [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
I don't understand the argument that the Infantry-AV effect is not a terrain effect. It's listed in the section titled "Terrain Effects." Quote: 1.8.4 Terrain Effects ... Armoured Vehicles: Infantry count as being in cover and receive the -1 to hit modifier... It's listed in the same place and fashion as the OW cover save. Even though I don't understand it, surely, the same argument would apply. Would anyone claim mounted troops were eligible for the OW cover save? |
Author: | Onyx [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
Thanks for clarifying the situation Neal. ![]() Seems I'm never too old to learn new things! |
Author: | Ginger [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Ork bikeboyz and Meka Dragsters |
Thanks Neal. However does this need an FAQ to reinforce the position:- Q. Do "mounted" infantry gain cover when on OW in the open or when touching Armoured Vehicles? A. No, "mounted" means they count as vehicles for these 'terrain' effects, not infantry. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |