If you need to make some, I may have a usable solution:
| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=22449 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | berzerkmonkey [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
If I have a unit of artillery using gun emplacements as their upgrade (vice a prime mover), is unit cohesion from the gun model or the emplacement model? The reason I ask is because with a prime mover model (Trojan) I could extend the line further between the guns using the Trojans as "extenders" since they are part of the unit. |
|
| Author: | Spectrar Ghost [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
Coherency is measured from the guns. You could extend the line with Trojans, but you'd lose the Cover Save without the Emplacements. In most cases the Emplacements are a better bet, I've found. |
|
| Author: | berzerkmonkey [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
Spectrar Ghost wrote: Coherency is measured from the guns. You could extend the line with Trojans, but you'd lose the Cover Save without the Emplacements. In most cases the Emplacements are a better bet, I've found. Yeah, I understand the Cover issue, I was just concerned regarding the size of the FW Emplacements. I haven't measured them yet, but it looks like they'll be sitting almost on top of each other. |
|
| Author: | nealhunt [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
It probably wont' matter, but it's worth keeping in mind that the emplacements have to be in coherency when you set them up as well. |
|
| Author: | berzerkmonkey [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
nealhunt wrote: It probably wont' matter, but it's worth keeping in mind that the emplacements have to be in coherency when you set them up as well. I assumed that, but with the size, I don't think that will be an issue. Thanks. |
|
| Author: | Spectrar Ghost [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
Oh you're using the FW emplacements. That makes more sense. Yeah, having Emplcements with a width of more than 50mm + width of the model could be problematic. Not sure how I'd correct it. |
|
| Author: | berzerkmonkey [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
I guess I'll play around with it. Worst case scenario, I'll have to make my own. |
|
| Author: | Spectrar Ghost [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
If you need to make some, I may have a usable solution:
|
|
| Author: | berzerkmonkey [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
Spectrar Ghost wrote: If you need to make some, I may have a usable solution: Nice - I'll keep you in mind! |
|
| Author: | EpicBattleBaggz [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
Spectrar Ghost wrote: If you need to make some, I may have a usable solution: Hey SG! Are those cast or did you hand craft them? |
|
| Author: | Spectrar Ghost [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
Those are casts of the original, which was hand made. |
|
| Author: | EpicBattleBaggz [ Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Question: Coherency with artillery using emplacements |
Hmmmmmm... |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|