Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
New superheavy! http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=20152 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | GlynG [ Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | New superheavy! |
Maybe we should add this tank to Epic? I mean it's on the GW site and that, so it's got to be balanced and reasonable right ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Ogre44 [ Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
Those smoke launchers definitely turn the cheese quotient on this one to 11. GW's gone too far, I'd walk away from the table if anyone put that on the table. Smoke launchers for God's sake!!!! |
Author: | Apocolocyntosis [ Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
![]() … and hey that ordinatus we slagged off last year is on there as well ![]() |
Author: | Ogre44 [ Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
Those freaking powergamers also gave it a Stormbolter. Totally over the top!!! |
Author: | GlynG [ Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
It could fire 14 shots per turn in epic, plus an unlimited range one-shot TK(D6) which the enemy has little chance to take out before it fires as well as the ability to carry 8 stands into battle. What a nice tank they've made! Mind you, you’d think that having the ICBM rockets venting flame down into the troop compartment might be a teeny bit of a design flaw, but they probably claim it's used to carry Space Marine Terminators into battle or something. In seriousness I would refuse to play against that frankenstein monstrosity and it's powergaming creator. |
Author: | Ginger [ Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
Reminds me of one of the spoofs on Rambo, where the gun crazed marine picks up a grenade launcher, carbine, Hevy machine gun, Stinger missile launcher, associated spare ammunition - - - and slowly topples over under the weight |
Author: | Carrington [ Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
Which reminds me of the MAUS, a German AFV prototype that was unable to cross bridges. It was a less-than-successful design for maneuver warfare. |
Author: | Morgan Vening [ Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
GlynG wrote: Maybe we should add this tank to Epic? I mean it's on the GW site and that, so it's got to be balanced and reasonable right ![]() How about we don't, and just say we did? Morgan Vening |
Author: | Legion 4 [ Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
Hmmmm ... I'm not sure if I like it ... ![]() |
Author: | GlynG [ Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
Legion 4 wrote: Hmmmm ... I'm not sure if I like it ... ![]() Good! I'd be worried if you did. Whoever converted that tank had a bad case of kitchen sink syndrome and little appreciation for aesthetics or feasibility. |
Author: | Ogre44 [ Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
C'mon, if you were 14 that thing would be the coolest tank ever. |
Author: | BlackLegion [ Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
No Apocalypse Datasheet. So i won't do Epic stats for this ![]() |
Author: | Jaggedtoothgrin [ Wed Feb 02, 2011 2:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
honestly, a superheavy with a deathstrike would be kinda neat... |
Author: | Legion 4 [ Wed Feb 02, 2011 5:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
GlynG wrote: Legion 4 wrote: Hmmmm ... I'm not sure if I like it ... ![]() Good! I'd be worried if you did. Whoever converted that tank had a bad case of kitchen sink syndrome and little appreciation for aesthetics or feasibility. Good to know ... ![]() |
Author: | Carrington [ Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New superheavy! |
That ... thing... would make more sense without treads, perhaps as a coastal defense/planetary defense installation. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |