Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
E:A is dead, long live E:A http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1088 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | iblisdrax [ Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Okay, in an assault, you figure up your hits with your CC and FF attacks, including any MW and extra attacks. Okay. Got that. How do you determine who gets the MW attacks? Because the rules say you remove pieces starting with base to base first, so if the piece that attacked with a MW loses its target before you get to its attack, what do you do then? Is its attack lost, or what? Sorry if this sounds confusing, but I am kinda confused. The rules say just count up your hits, implying that FF and CC hits are counted together. Any clarification would be appreciated. ![]() my 2cents, iblisdrax |
Author: | Freshmetal [ Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Reading section 2.2.6, I would say that all cc and ff hits are rolled and allocated (and saving throw rolled) first, THEN the extra attacks from MW's are worked out. It states that hits from macro weapons can ONLY be applied to units that are in a position to be hit by that weapon. (ie: base contact/weapon's range), so I would say that the extra attack was lost if it couldn't hit. When you head in for an assault, you simply have to decide whether or not to commit your MW units further into an enemy formation (eg: Warlords leading a charge into battle), so that after the first kills are removed from the front of the enemy formation, your MW weapons are still useable on those enemy further back. It's simply a tactical decision you have to make. |
Author: | CrimsonFury [ Fri Apr 09, 2004 4:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Yep. All "normal" CC and FF hits are allocated together (starting from base-to-base and then gradually allocating futher away). Then roll saves Then allocate MW hits, if the target is lost, you don't get the MW attack. Jervis said this was intentional because he didn't want CC macro weapons to become to powerful like power weapons in WH40K. |
Author: | iblisdrax [ Fri Apr 09, 2004 11:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Okay I get it now. Thanks guys. ![]() my 2cents, iblisdrax |
Author: | Magnus [ Fri Feb 25, 2005 9:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
In case anyone is still wondering what the future holds for the Epic line, point your browser on this thread: http://www.specialist-games.com/epic/fo ... IC_ID=5596 Swordwind is the last printed book for E:A. Future supplements are online only. No new books + few or no new minis = very dead game line. So long, E:A. God bless NetEpic..... |
Author: | CyberShadow [ Fri Feb 25, 2005 10:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Rumours of its demise have been greatly exaggerated. I have also seen the upcoming 'plans' for the game, and I must admit that I am extremely frustrated by it all. GW seems to be cutting the diversity in their business. This can only be bad. I am sure that many people get into the hobby because it is a whole new and complete environment. The question has already been raised as to how they can make the accountants notice by giving away rules and publications for free and cutting back drastically the minis produced, if they couldnt do it when people were actually paying for them. The cut back of SG, along with the axing of both Warhammer Monthly (ok) and Inferno (oh no!) are two steps which cannot help even their main games range. That being said, I dont think that EA will really die. I do think that there is already a good support network for it (almost like Jervis didnt fully trust the support level ![]() I dont think that that game will realy die, but I also dont believe that 'official' support will count for anything or help the game much. It will live through its dedicated player. |
Author: | primarch [ Fri Feb 25, 2005 11:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Hi! Some things are so "true" that it takes all the fun out of commenting on them.... ![]() E:A, in my view will go the way of epic 40k, becuase like that game its not a "complete" game. Meaning, it doesnt have offical published rules for all armies and at no point was there a full line of available miniatures for ALL armies. The only reason second edition space marine and titan legions has lasted as long as it has thorugh netepic is becuase it a "full" system. You name it SM2/TL/Netepic has it. No unit, army or model of choice has been deleted or forgotten. While I can hardly say fans of this older system or netepic are in generous abundance, the fact that we can still build on its "completeness" gives us the edge to last as many years as there are people who care to invest in it. Epic 40 nor E:A have this advantage. If you are a chaos or tyranid player you just got hosed for the second time in a row. No new rules or figs. Yes, we can be optimistic and expect "something" in the form of support, but as I have pointed out since Epic A was still a gleam in Jervis's eye, GW doesnt want to support it, so it will just fade away. There are only two things which, in my view, need to happen for Epic A to be anywhere near where netepic is years from now, and those are: 1. A group of people need to step up to the plate and do NetEpic A. In other words cut the cord from GW and extend and expand missing army lists, quickly and efficiently. Easier said than done, but vital to its continued exisitance. 2. FW needs to fill the gap in epic minis production. It seems poised to do just that, but well see if epics fading market presence does/or doesnt affect FW's perception on making money off epic. In my view history WILL repeat itself with Epic A unless some true fans salvage it. Trying to keep it alive, while still depending on GW is just day dreaming. Its only a little more than a year since its release and quite frankly its at leasts as bad off than epic 40k was at a similar time frame. Any version can "live" in the most basic sense (somebody, somehwere plays it), but without support from some group, how alive will it truely be? Yea, yea, I know, my usual "doom and gloom" you say. But while I am not a native Missourian, I do agree with their state motto.... ...SHOW ME! ...and GW has "shown me" they dont care about epic..... Primarch |
Author: | Freshmetal [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 1:04 am ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Hi, Personally, although I like to think about E:A optimistically, I must say that I agree with a lot of what Primarch and CS said. I am saddened by the way that things seem to be going, but I have faith in the "devoted" community (ie:those who have helped develop the rulebook and those who maintained NetEpic) that we will see continued development of E:A, whether it is in an official capacity or independant. I've seen enough inspirational stuff from the Epicomms "crew" and a handful of other people on the SG forums to know that there are people willing to contribute their time and ideas to keeping the spirit of E:A alive. And on an associated note... As none of us can exactly affect GW's financial business or their marketing strategy (awful though it is), it really annoys me to see so many threads on the official forums complaining about how people can't get their favourite army or how the minis are too expensive (it sucks, but deal with it! search ebay, etc) and a million other things. It's clear that Jervis and the other SG guys are doing their best with limited GW support and that they'll do their best to continue to produce minis/release rules. Online-only supplements and a slow release schedule would suck ass, but if it means E:A can continue over it dying another death, then so be it (although it's not my first choice, believe me). I know that even I (oh yes, it's true!) can whinge and whine about the bad side of E:A/GW/SG, but if the community can maintain the appetite for E:A that I have seen (in general) since even before it's release, then I for one shall remain optimistic. /End of Rant (for now) Cheers, Freshmetal |
Author: | primarch [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 1:37 am ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Hi! What is kind of unfair is that the person that least deserves to be reading and hearing about how bad epic support is - Jervis, is also very helpless to change GWs policies regarding SG games. I wonder, very strongly, just when Jervis will follow in Andy Chambers footsteps...... Primarch |
Author: | Haarken [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:24 am ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
GW has too many products to juggle at the moment cutting out the least profitable makes sense, it is a shame that it is epic that is being cut out but to be perfectly honest I am not entirely suprised, whilst Epic has always held a dear place in my heart it has not held a dear place in GW's heart for a long time. Having taken a long break from GW, I decided to set foot in a GW store again only to find that they only play three games now. 40k, Warhammer and LOTR... I asked one of the guys about epic and he had like no clue, told me that I had to order epic minis either instore or online. Heh I'm a 22yr old and I'm a little apprehensive about handing money over and not having anything in return until 1 or 2 weeks time, Imagine how a 12/13yr old feels. GW doesnt want Epic around and I can see BFG, Necromunda, Warmaster and the other SG games dissappearing soon too. |
Author: | Legion 4 [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 5:46 am ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Too bad ... but this does not look good, no matter how you look at it. Personally, I've got over 14 years worth of EPIC rules and models. But I would have liked to see some of the new models they talked about. F/W may make few Epic pieces, as it always has. And don't forget they did the complete Tau Army, save for a few pieces, which probably will be made eventually. But who knows about F/Orks, Necrons, etc., etc ... ![]() |
Author: | iblisdrax [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:06 am ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Sigh. Bad news again. Primarch, you may be right, Epic:A may fade away. But like Epic40k before it, my small group will play it regardless of what GW does or doesnt do. Because we like the rules. Nuff said. my 2cents, iblisdrax |
Author: | Markconz [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:22 am ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
![]() At least you'll still be able to get the miniatures and there is a 'Net-Epic Armageddon' already in existance... Nonetheless I am not happy about this development. |
Author: | primarch [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 3:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Hi! As I said before, fans of the system MUST take a vested interest in its further development to continue its existance. Those "beta rules" they have posted should be mass test tested and modified to suit the needs of the hard core fans and made available post haste. Its a lot of work, make no mistake, but its rewarding and fun. I have full confidence that several people on these forums could easily coordinate and lead such an effort. Go forth and play epic! Primarch |
Author: | stormseer [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 4:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | E:A is dead, long live E:A |
Bah.... I find myself taking Primarch's cynical point of views on GW more and more every time something like this comes up. ![]() Poor Jervis, it must be dreadful for him to be so limited in what he can do for the system with GW's mad new policies.... ![]() |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |