Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Spirit Stones Poll 2 - Formation Specific http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=5698 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Markconz [ Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Spirit Stones Poll 2 - Formation Specific |
As per Tactica's recommendation I have made a new poll on the spirit stone rule. In the last poll a majority (slim some may call it! ![]() Please note that under this proposal for a spirit stone rule - an eldar formation must be entirely composed of the units described by the choices, ie: 1. AV 2. LV/AV 4. AV with infantry (entirely embarked) in the formation 5. LV/AV with infantry (entirely embarked) in the formation |
Author: | Hojyn [ Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Spirit Stones Poll 2 - Formation Specific |
I voted "AV only", but I'd like to extend my vote to EoVs as well, as I think they are fragile enough already. (I would have voted in the first poll, but I tried the "View results" button first... and realized this counted as a Null vote ![]() |
Author: | Markconz [ Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:38 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Spirit Stones Poll 2 - Formation Specific | ||
There's always one... ![]() ![]() Your opinion is noted... |
Author: | MC23 [ Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Spirit Stones Poll 2 - Formation Specific |
I can't explain why, but whenever I see a poll that isn't created by Me or Tepoc I see it as pointless. We are not going to decide this as a poll. Opinions at this time are unsupported. I stand by proposal that everyone interested in reigning in Spirit Stones follow so we will have a real pool of information and experience to speak from. I'm not going to rush into any changes at this time. |
Author: | MC23 [ Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Spirit Stones Poll 2 - Formation Specific |
I'm going to lock this thread as I see it as a distraction at this time. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |