| Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
| Partial test list suggested by the AC (Non-ERC endorsed) http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=23855 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | LordotMilk [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Partial test list suggested by the AC (Non-ERC endorsed) |
Here follows what Chroma (Eldar AC) has expressly mentioned he would like to see tested in some of the more recent threads: - Phantom/Warlock Pulsar: 3 shots instead of two. - Scorpion EoV: 3 shots instead of two. - Cobra EoV: 3BP instead of 2BP on main weapon system. Edit: Renamed the thread so as to not provoke any confusion on the author of the thread. |
|
| Author: | Angel_of_Caliban [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chroma's Test List |
LordotMilk wrote: Here follows what Chroma (Eldar AC) has expressly mentioned he would like to see tested in some of the more recent threads: - Phantom/Warlock Pulsar: 3 shots instead of two. - Scorpion EoV: 3 shots instead of two. - Cobra EoV: 3BP instead of 2BP on main weapon system. Should be listed as Titan Pulsar as this should be left to Chroma to issue for several reasons. |
|
| Author: | LordotMilk [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chroma's Test List |
Hi Angel, Could you explain what you mean? LotM |
|
| Author: | Lego [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chroma's Test List |
I'm one of those people who reads boards for years and never post but I finally decided to get myself an account. Yay!  I would be interested in trying out the scorpion changes but should that be 3*MW2+ or 3*MW3+? Our group has been thinking about trying a 3*MW3+, 75 cm scorpion and wee what impact that has. |
|
| Author: | LordotMilk [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chroma's Test List |
I believe Chroma meant that the only stat evolution he wanted tested at this stage was the addition of a single shot to the Pulsar ans Scorpion armament. So, 3 shots at 2+ at 60 cm range is the answer to your question. |
|
| Author: | Angel_of_Caliban [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chroma's Test List |
Meaning that Chroma has a set list of things in mind he wanted to test. The above might have been all in that list or not or tierd differently. Either way as the Eldar AC and Xenos Chair it up to him. And if not him then an Eldar Sub-AC. I know Chroma has been missing here and there but in till the ERC makes a change we should wait on Chroma. As noted already there are some confusion or wishing, without the guidance of the AC it gets messy. |
|
| Author: | LordotMilk [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chroma's Test List |
I agree with you on all points. However Chroma has specifically mentioned he wanted these three things tested. I only grouped them here so that it would be easily accessible, and so that it wouldn't be buried in the middle of 20 pages of discussion on the topics. I therefore don't see the problem? |
|
| Author: | Angel_of_Caliban [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chroma's Test List |
LordotMilk wrote: I agree with you on all points. However Chroma has specifically mentioned he wanted these three things tested. I only grouped them here so that it would be easily accessible, and so that it wouldn't be buried in the middle of 20 pages of discussion on the topics. I therefore don't see the problem? I read the posts too. But what if he had a different idea about them? Or had plans for more important playtests? or Wanted them in concert with some others? Plus someone has already raised a clarifying question and the AC isn't here to address them. I see your intent but I disagree with your approach is all. |
|
| Author: | LordotMilk [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chroma's Test List |
Renamed the thread |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|