Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
War Walker Cost http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=19632 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:54 am ] |
Post subject: | War Walker Cost |
I personally couldn't get a good idea of community feeling in the War Walker cost debate, so I was just wondering if we could get some hands in the air? |
Author: | Spectrar Ghost [ Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
I don't mind the 4-6 @ 35pt ea. I usually take a formation of 5 and a formation of six rangers, and interlock them, forming an especially resilient scout screen. However, if there is a real push against the current pricing, my next choice would be 4 @ 150 with option for 1-2 @ 25 ea. |
Author: | nealhunt [ Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
Not 35 points each. Either of the other options is fine. |
Author: | Angel_of_Caliban [ Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
Spectrar Ghost wrote: I don't mind the 4-6 @ 35pt ea. Bit your tongue Heretic!!! I will cleanse you by Fire so you may know the 35 is a number of Chaos!!! But really....I'm okay with either option, just no 35 pointers... |
Author: | Markconz [ Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
Option 1 or 3. |
Author: | Ginger [ Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
Ditto Neal, Markonz |
Author: | Dwarf Supreme [ Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
Yup, 1 or 3. |
Author: | Apologist [ Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
I like the 200pts for six option best. It seems to reflect the slightly restrictive, tradition-bound feeling of the Eldar. Rangers don't have that, as they're much more free. |
Author: | Kealios [ Thu Nov 11, 2010 11:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
<-- Heretic. Voted for what it is currently (@35ea!) |
Author: | Angel_of_Caliban [ Fri Nov 12, 2010 2:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
Kealios wrote: <-- Heretic. Voted for what it is currently (@35ea!) *Beats Kealios with a Holy Club of Cleansing....then looks for Flamer...* He meant that he wasn't for 35 points each.... ![]() |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
Currently, removing the "No opinion" votes: - 6 units for 200pts has 50% support, - 4 units for 150pts with an upgrade of 1-2 units for 25pts each has 41.6% support - 4-6 units for 35pts each has 8.3% support |
Author: | Ginger [ Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
Evil and Chaos wrote: Currently, removing the "No opinion" votes: - 6 units for 200pts has 50% support, - 4 units for 150pts with an upgrade of 1-2 units for 25pts each has 41.6% support - 4-6 units for 35pts each has 8.3% support so either option 1 or 3, and I suspect most are fairly ambivalent about which is actually used. ![]() |
Author: | Evil and Chaos [ Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: War Walker Cost |
With the official rule being option 1, I'd say inertia should probably work in its favour, unless there's a majority who want change. |
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |