Warp Hunters are described as being very rare; I'd suggest up to one in non Yme-Loc Swords of Vaul Troupes, and up to three in Yme-Loc Swords of Vaul Warhosts.

Edit:


It's the Aetheric Rift that gives SA IC, not the ShuriCats, which all Falcon hulls have.

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.

And we will be applying this to Epic Eldar Cobras when? Stooopid Void Shields....

_________________
~Laserwolf

Yes, we know, the game was intended to be played in the 2000-5000 points range...

I don't think the Warp Hunter warrants TitanKiller.

@Lsrwolf: Well at least the Cobra has Ignore Cover against WarEngines

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/

It's a bigger d-cannon, so it could be a TK weapon (MW feels better though). I'd think the important part would be to balance it against a Falcon.

Yes the bigger size is the reason for the longer range and the alternate firing mode with the ability to cover more area at a much shorter range in Wh40k.

On the Epic level there is no difference to the Support Weapon Platfrom with Ignore Cover to the basic FF attack. Perhabs 45cm range.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/

I like the idea of new aspect warriors, thanks for the stats.

Eldar Shadow Spectre
Type Speed Armour CloseCombat Firefight
Infantry 25cm 5+ 6+ 5+
Weapon Range Firepower Notes
Prism rifles (15cm) Small Arms -
Ghostlight 45cm AT4+ Lance

Notes: Jumppacks, Invulnerable Save

I like those stats. They make good AT infantry, but why do they have Inv. Save?? do they have some Holo-Field equipment??

_________________
Epic Armageddon in Spanish (from Spain): http://www.box.net/shared/3u5vr8a370

Konig Armoured Regiment FanList: https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 41#p581941

Yes, they each have a holofield.

Clicky link for 40k rules

_________________
Industrious, red-robe wearing member of the PCRC

If they have a holofield, justifying an invulnerable save, why not just make their armour save 4+?
This would match existing Aspects, simplify dice rolling and make them a little more vulnerable and 'Eldar-like' from an E:A perspective.

Jump packs just allows 15cm disembarkation zone from (WE?) transports, right? Seems fine to me. I'd rather the Inv Save be added to the standard AR value (so AR4+). Not because I don't think it's justified by the fluff, but because Inv Save is a Character thing (I think) for infantry and it would feel odd on a standard infantry unit, Aspect or not.

I think 45cm AT4+ Lance would be really good - 8 shots for 300pts, able to hide in cover but hit'n'run with that 25cm move. Compared to 12 shots without Lance for the Falcons (even with the extra 10cm move) seems pretty good. I don't think FF5 completely makes up for that as they're unlikely to be used in assaults other than as support fire.

For the Warp Hunter, those stats seem more or less right. One thing to think about would be how many hits (and points of damage) would a fm of 1/ 3/ 6 get against a war engine compared to a Cobra and for how many points?

As for the Hornet, well all my Vypers will now be counting as Hornets! Can't see any point in taking Vypers any more..

Jump pack also allows you to 'jump' over impassable or difficult terrain which is another slight boost to the unit's mobility, as well as being able to dismount 15cm from air transport (only the standard 5cm from other transport).

ah, didn't know that, thanks!

now i have to decide if i'm going to model some of my falcons into warp hunters or just keep my old models.. also i need to up date my eldar stat sheet in my epic bible.